you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 years ago (8 children)

The containers still run an OS, have proprietary application code on them, and have memory that probably contains other user's data in it. Not saying it's likely, but containers don't really fix much in the way of gaining privileged access to steal information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    That's why it's containers... in containers

    It's like wearing 2 helmets. If 1 helmet is good, imagine the protection of 2 helmets!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The OS in a container is usually pretty barebones though. Great containers usually use distroless base images. https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/distroless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ah, so there is something even more barebones than Alpine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    Sure, there's also the scratch image, which is entirely empty... So if your app is just a single statically linked binary, your entire container contents can be a single binary.

    The busybox image is also more barebones than alpine, but still has a couple of basic tools.

  • source
  • parent