World News

2307 readers

86 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

248

Priorities (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

307 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

require boots on the ground occupation to annex a territory

I annex Texas in the name of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea by virtue of being in the state. Sorry FBI, cope and seethe.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I annex Texas in the name of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

Somehow I feel like that's an improvement.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's because almost anywhere being annexed by the DPRK is an improvement.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know, I feel like that would be a logistical and administrative nightmare, especially as the population of Texas is 5 million more then North Korea, and not that many Texans speak Korean while an equally few North Koreans speak English.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It would still be better than the current administration.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbf you could probably drum up a lot of support for the DPRK in Texas by offering Texans the right to personal nukes, courtesy of Kim.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sure, but on the other hand, this is Texas we’re talking about. It would turn into nuclear winter real fast…