85
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

that wealth redistribution question is pretty lit tho

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 46 points 2 years ago

Some of the phrasing is extremely sus. The last one in particular: "to protect the feelings and safety of marginalized groups"

๐ŸŽผ One ๐ŸŽถ Of ๐ŸŽต These ๐ŸŽถ Things ๐ŸŽต

๐ŸŽผ Is ๐ŸŽถ Not ๐ŸŽต Like ๐ŸŽถ The ๐ŸŽต Other ๐ŸŽถ

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

Yeah that seemed like obvious manipulation to me as well. If you're going to conflate them both that's already a mistake. To put safety second is obvious de prioritization and most people will then subconsciously think primarily of 'feelings' in that question's context.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also, yes. I think that I have more of a right to a pleasant day than some ill-mannered cousinfucker has a right to be a douchebag.

After the revolution, being disrespectful will get you the gulag.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
85 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22744 readers
417 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS