71
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

A five-judge Constitution bench of the top court on Tuesday unanimously refused to accord legal recognition to same-sex marriages under the Special Marriage Act, ruling that it is within the Parliament's ambit to change the law for validating such a union.

Writing a 247-page separate judgement, Chief Justice of India (CJI) D Y Chandrachud struck down Regulation 5(3) of the CARA, saying it is violative of the rights of the queer community and that the CARA has exceeded its authority in barring unmarried couples from adopting children.

The five-judge bench, however, passed a 3:2 verdict against adoption rights for the LGBTQIA++ community.

I have no idea how the SC of India works. Do these articles contradict each other, or are they blind people describing different parts of the same elephant?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

The verdict u linked was majority one. The verdict the commentator linked was the minority one.

The same-sex marriage petition was rejected based on a 3-2 bench.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
71 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

3797 readers
10 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS