this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
536 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59119 readers
2901 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NY bill would require a criminal history background check for the purchase of a 3D printer::Requires a criminal history background check for the purchase of a three-dimensional printer capable of creating firearms; prohibits sale to a person who would be disqualified on the basis of criminal history from being granted a license to possess a firearm.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, did we start requiring criminal background checks for pipes and metal stock too? This is the same problem we’re facing in the rest of the country, everything can be used as a weapon, and requiring background checks on all of them is gonna do nothing to stop gun crime. Regulate the damn guns, that is the only thing that will help.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

US: We have a gun problem.

Also, US: We’ve tried everything but regulate guns and we’re all out of ideas!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Lol, are you insane? I'm not against better controls, but if you think the US is lacking in gun control laws and regulations you are sorely mistaken.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No you don't understand. The pro-gun community would support a solution, it just needs to be instantly and 100% effective without inconveniencing a single gun owner or costing anything.

It's a completely reasonable position and not at all just an excuse to do nothing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe the answer is that every single human being should own a gun and carry it every single place they go 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where do I put it when I'm showering tho?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

on the sink right next to the shower would be my guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You could do what that one guy did and put one in a piece of Tupperware mounted to the shower wall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What if my dog gets it? I need a waterproof holster. Or a condom.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Isn't it just fascinating how all the solutions proposed by gun owners and Republican politicians just happen to coincide with what's most profitable for the gun lobby?

But I'm sure people who manufacture guns are much more moral than the tobacco industry, oil industry, sugar industry, asbestos industry and all those other groups that got caught putting profits before people's lives.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

America isn't the only country in the world with hardware stores yet is still the only country in the world with weekly mass shootings -- 80% of which use legally purchased firearms and 0% of which use home made guns.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"I sure am glad this doesn't happen every week"

- Shinzo Abe

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"The important thing is that no gun owners were mildly inconvenienced"

- Thousands of dead school children, executed partners and victims of crime

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re getting downvoted to shit on most of your comments but just wanted to say you are not wrong.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except comments where I use a % -- those still have a conspicuously positive score. I wonder if someone's sleazy tools are being thrown off by it?