this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
909 points (97.0% liked)

World News

32294 readers
682 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest revolution in history and led to an almost entirely equitable distribution of land ownership

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

And how did that work out for the estimated 15-55 million people that died of starvation as a result of the "equitable distribution of land ownership"?

Source

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a childish response. So the famine didn't occur because it's documented on Wikipedia?

The reasons for the famine are well understood and documented. I don't think defending Mao is the way to go in regards to our modern housing crisis.

The housing market issue is also well understood and documented. We know companies and investors have been buying more and more houses, driving up prices. We know wages have not kept pace with rising housing costs. We know the gap between rich and poor has been widening year after year. Why the fuck are we derailing the conversation?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

First off, I'm not denying the famine happened, aim just denying Wikipedia's framing. The death counts are exaggerated and many were connected to devastation caused by the Civil War.

Second off, I am not advocating we do mid 20th century agriculture practices and kill the sparrows after doing land reform.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)