Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

Iโ€™m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. ๐Ÿ˜Š I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 41 points 3 years ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (10 children)
  • [โ€“] 5 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    It could be considered a form of gaslighting, since initially they stated their actual intent, and then pretended like the opposite was their intent all along.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 3 years ago (6 children)
  • [โ€“] 1 point 3 years ago (4 children)

    Social engineering is, after all, a form of hacking. Although... is social engineering an AI considered social engineering, since the AI isn't actually socializing? That's a question for later, I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Hey look buddy now I'm an engineer that means I solve practical problems not problems like is social engineering a ai hacking or is social engineering haking for non scilicon computers because that would fall into your conundrums of philosophy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Hahaha!! That's an awesome response hahahaha

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments