845
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 years ago

Apparently some of the Republicans are talking about nominating Trump as speaker. The speaker doesn't technically need to be a member of congress. I wonder if there are enough anti-Trump republicans in the House to block that. If it's a close vote and certain congress people block Trump, they could get a mountain of hate.

[-] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Amazing that the founding fathers didn't contemplate the possibility of a felon under active lawsuits becoming speaker

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 29 points 2 years ago

In defense of the founding fathers, they were all traitors to the crown and enemies of the state when they wrote that.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Possibly they were young and drunk too.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They also sold drugs, ran guns, and said fuck the law. This documentary touches on it.

https://youtu.be/ABhyKEK-CDg?si=5g1fbVMMqLtoJoSR

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Boys will be boys

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

The founding fathers were amazingly shit at game theory.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Considering no one would formalize game theory for 150 years it's not particularly surprising.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

You don't need to necessarily formalize game theory to consider things like: hey, we just gave the president the authority to pardon. Couldn't they abuse that? What if they pardon someone who was doing something illegal that they ordered? What if they commit a crime and pardon themselves?

I mean, that's the most obvious one that you don't really need formal game theory to know could be a problem. Then there are all the other problems. Checks and balances are good, but when a powerful faction uses its power to put loyalists into the thing that's supposed to balance them, the system seems to unravel.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago

They didn't even contemplate the House Speaker being in the Presidential line of succession. Which is the reason they want to put Trump there. Not that it would work; they'd have to remove both the President and Vice President at the same time, and the Senate ain't going to do that.

[-] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

An angry mob with strong will to unalive certain people before the #3 in the line of succession would be a major concern

[-] homesnatch@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Only 3-4 republican votes are needed to block any candidate since the Democrats will all be voting against.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Yes, but if Trump is on board, can you imagine the mountain of hate mail and death threats those 3-4 would receive? Would they have the guts to accept that consequence?

[-] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 years ago

This is one of the least likely scenarios.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

That sounds scary if possible

[-] elscallr@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

that ain't going to happen

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Speaker of the house is 3rd in line to take over if the VP and Pres are dead or unavailable.

Question is if you think that MAGA and foreign intelligence would be up for forcing that issue.

[-] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Making Trump speaker would be a major national security risk to Biden and Harris. Gives way too many lunatics big ideas is there's a direct benefit to their movement. Not to mention it WAYYY to closely mirrors the arc of Hitlers rise. Failed coup attempt, followed by taking on a secondary post a few years later.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
845 points (98.3% liked)

News

35915 readers
3378 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS