this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
653 points (93.0% liked)

memes

10686 readers
1901 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

according to English grammatical rules it's a perfectly valid method of referring to a singular person

show me ONE fucking example prior to 2000 of people using "it" for persons without it being dehumanizing

singular "they" has fulfilled this function for at least 500 years. "it" has never been a pronoun for humans, until it recently saw use as a neo-pronoun.

there is no grammar rulebook. grammar is usage. you are claiming that it's been used like that. you're wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're more than welcome to go back in time and inform my 10th grade teacher of this. Lemme know how that works out for you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh shit nvm didn't realize your tenth grade English teacher said otherwise mb

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In all fairness, they read out the part of the textbook that went over it. This was also the same paragraph that explained they can be used as well as the difference between you singular and the royal you.

That being said I'm sure we were both sarcastic in our prior responses but I'm attempting to show that I'm not pulling this out of my ass and I'm relying on a source of truth.