this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
175 points (96.3% liked)

politics

18917 readers
3550 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Then it's gonna suck to be in the Military or Border Patrol, and have to report for duty without pay. Especially when Congress will get paid.

There were about 1.4 million active military personnel in 2022.

CBP (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) has more than 60,000 employees.

WIC served about 6.3 million participants each month in fiscal year 2022, including an estimated 39 percent of all infants in the United States. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/wic-program/

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Elected officials should be the last to get paid with no back pay if they allow this shit to happen willingly like this.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

If only they weren't rich already and can weather it out easily.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

That's the thing they get paid. They however shouldn't be allowed to leave the building until the shutdown is over and they reach a deal.

No where else can you completely fail and your job and keep it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nah they should be the ones responsible for paying the back pay. Fuck em.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You get used to it. Republicans shut down the government every 2-4 years.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You misspelt "have a temper tantrum".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No the temper tantrum is pretty much constant at this point. That's how the GQP thrive, whip up their base to get angry against an imaginary bogeyman. Gay people, trans people, minorities, abortions, dems taking away guns, socialism, whatever. It's like that meme, they don't want to be informed they want to be angry.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It’s getting so bad that republicans are having temper tantrums from shit other republicans do (or in this case, don’t do.)

It’s hilarious. Geatz seriously needs to realize that if he doesn’t play ball and compromise…. McCarthy is gonna go with the dems. Which means compromise in the wrong direction; from his point of view.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the threat from Groomer Gaetz is if McCarthy compromises with Dems, Gaetz will initiate a recall on McCarthy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

well... yeah.

but that's not going to go anywhere. Gaetz doesn't have the votes to replace him. Gaetz does that... and that's even more influence and compromises with the dems. All this is going to show that the idiots in the freedom caucus don't understand the basic functions of the job.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That reminds me... I need to put popcorn on the grocery list.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

he makes it look so easy...

It's not too hard, but yeah. Delicious, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are not thinking multiple moves ahead. It's a slow boat but we can all see where it goes. In fact we could all see it months ago when McCarthy made the deal with the devil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

pretty sure we all commented on it then, too. They're playing checkers like a 4 yo still learning about rules and stuff...

It'd be funny if it wasn't going to hurt people. lots. it's going to hurt lots of people.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would happen if all border guards just said "Well, I'm not getting paid, I'm not going to work." and just left the gates open? 🤔 I think that would solve the shutdown real quick!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

As a practical matter, it would mean international flights to the US are halted. If you will recall the last time there was a shutdown and it appeared that TSA agents were going to walk off the job due to not being paid, they reached an agreement to end the shutdown pretty quickly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Shhhh! If you tell conservatives that a government shutdown results in starving babies, they will never open it back up!