this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
910 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5263 readers
1637 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mercifully, g=9.8 everywhere on Earth's surface, so we use weight interchangeably with mass, but yes, we should weigh ourselves in Newton: "I need to lose 10kg, so I can reach my ideal weigh of 700N" :P

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mercifully, g=9.8 everywhere on Earth's

Big nope. It depends not only on height, but also on density of stuff under ground.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say it's more of a "small yes" than a "big nope."

While gravity does vary, it goes from about 9.76 to about 9.83.

All of which does, in fact, round to 9.8

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On ISS it's 8.722, but it's constantly falling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everything experiences different gravity (and “apparent gravity”) in space. We should pass a treaty of using metric only there, if only to avoid losing more spacecraft.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The pedantry in this post is so dense you would need a torch to cut through it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What's the variation? Does it ever get to 9.9 or 9.7? It's a negligible "nope" for people weighing themselves :D

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We are talking about engieneering use. Though good scales can be callibrated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You can look up gravity survey maps but it's not a huge variation in the habitable altitudes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We already have a permanently inhabited base outside Earth (ISS) with effectively zero gravity and there might be one on the Moon or Mars in 100 years. We should pass treaties to only use metric in space – a probe has been lost to unit confusion already.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is dated 2007. Apparently NASA is already using metric:

NASA Finally Goes Metric

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know, it has always used metric but the SW was by Lockheed Martin. Still, we need to convince potential extraterrestrial civilians.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

We will convince them by force if necessary. They will adopt the Metric or get barred from entering the space bar

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On ISS it's ≈.89g, but agreed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I said “effectively zero gravity” for a reason – the term is “zero gravity” but I know it's a misnomer.