this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
52 points (96.4% liked)

General Discussion

12053 readers
164 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

@LMAO is flooding the site with random communities because they're salty about being banned for claiming too many community names. They claim they're trying to "fuck your entire site up" but I imagine it's a relatively quick fix to delete all the communities they're creating, LMAO.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Looking at his profile

Since you banned my main for claiming community names, I’ll just fuck your entire site up instead. Much love, Angled

Yeah can't imagine why an instance admin might not want this insufferable piece of shit in their instance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I bet it’s really spez, same energy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They need to start email verification. It will slow the trolls down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn't help too much, you can generate infinite email accounts with gmail for an example.

Manual acceptance of each and every user helps, but it's not sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not if you filter out . and + in gmail addresses.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In any address. Most email services support + and a few support . as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure but in gmail addresses, the dots are ignored, and anything after the + is also ignored. You can add as many dots as you want and will still go to the same address.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't even need that, 1 click temporary email boxes everywhere

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's what I used.... I have no intention of being a troll or asshole, but I don't want social media like this platform linked to me IRL and never have.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

He got his fee-fees hurt because others didn't like that he was trying to be a selfish asshole (shocking) so now he thinks it's justice to destroy a site and affect multiple people who didn't even do anything to him. πŸ˜‚ jfc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe admins should restrict community creation for a few days.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be giving these assholes exactly what they want.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe, but what's the alternative? Other trolls seeing this vulnerability and just letting it run?

I would venture that these assholes just want maximum carnage. Requiring admin approval for a few days while a fix is pushed would mitigate that carnage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, purging them likely isn't taking that much admin time?

One click, and bam, all their communities, usernames, etc. etc. are gone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Idk, seems like this is quite a pivotal time with an influx of users. Be a shame to have the potential growth in community go to waste.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but they could limit community creation to, say, five a day. That would be more than the vast majority of people would legitimately need.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately that would mean that real communities wouldn't be created since that would be used up by someone creating spam communities. Though, maybe limiting the amount of communities that could be made by one account in a certain amount of time? What about verification by email (to send a coherent reason) to the admins to create a community.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I was meaning five per day for a given user. That's why I said that would be plenty for most individuals - most people aren't legitimately going to want to create more than five communities in a day, and for them it wouldn't be a hardship to wait a day for another five. But for people like this guy, trying to flood the instance with endless/pointless communities, it would cut that down to a manageable number.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Counterpoint: we don't need growth if the cost is the destruction of a good thing. Guided growth is smarter and more sustainable especially when users like the subject of this post aren't unique. There are a lot of small, mean-spirited people out there who will take a dump all over everything the moment they can.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Growth for the sake of growth is why reddit and everything else crashes and burns.