you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

That can’t be true. If targeting you was a rational decision someone else would have targeted you a long time ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Maybe I just went below the indifference curve and was worth the cost to target.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Probably targeting got cheaper. I think this is a left shift in the targeting curve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I did just wake up - wouldn't this be a right shift in targeting curve? Lower cost of targeting me is a supply side change.

    At any specific cost to target there is an increased quantity willing to accept that cost?

  • source
  • parent