35
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I might write a summary later

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago

Forgive me if I’m confusing him with someone else, but Cockshott is TERF-ish, right?

[-] [email protected] 47 points 2 years ago

hes a terf and homophobe and a good free resource for marxian economics.

it is what it is emilie-shrug

[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago

Hossenfelder has also been a little TERFy lately, so if the TERFs want to fight it out, I’ll put critical support behind the one who is at least correct about the economics.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h3ccRFtS90

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI792W5rkoA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFCYbjSISoA

weirdo behavior

in the last video he makes the case that gay and lesbian couples are less oppressed than straight couples and should be taxed for it citing "only the top 10% of straight families are as well off as a mid income gay couple"

then makes the argument that the "Rainbow Movement" has an inherently middle class basis and no revolutionary potential.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago

What the fuck is going on in Britain lol

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

There has GOT to be something in the water over there.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

maw oi wot u mean i aint sposed to be drinkin sea woter

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

he makes the case that gay and lesbian couples are less oppressed than straight couples and should be taxed for it citing "only the top 10% of straight families are as well off as a mid income gay couple"

How does someone spend their entire life researching how to use computers to plan an entire socialist economy and not realize that marginalized people tend to have greater economic difficulties?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

if I recall the ridiculous core of his argument is that homosexual couples don't have children and so don't have to carry the burden of raising families unlike het proles. Which is absurd. I should know, because I was raised by two women. Is he unaware that LGBT people adopt children? Often the unwanted children of neglectful cishet parents? And also play roles in larger multigenerational family support structures even when they don't have children? Nah, he can probably figure that out. He's just a phobe. That's to say nothing of the systemic discrimination against LGBT in the home, school, workplace, places of worship, and public in general, because of antiquated bourgeois and feudal "morality" forced onto society at gunpoint by reactionaries.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

in the last video he makes the case that gay and lesbian couples are less oppressed than straight couples and should be taxed for it citing "only the top 10% of straight families are as well off as a mid income gay couple"

brainworms

load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22723 readers
49 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS