this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22023 readers
37 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Only people who are too lazy to do anything say stuff like this. There are 8 billion of us. If everybody did something small that would make a huge difference.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I disagree with “only”. I think it oversimplifies the issue. People who aren’t lazy, but are frustrated by corporate/governmental/civil inaction, say stuff like that, too.

A disheartening number of people simply don’t accept science. Others are too selfish or greedy to do anything that doesn’t have a short-term benefit. Climate change should be recognized as an urgent threat to the entire world, but instead, it’s become politicized.

People constantly do dumb things that are against their own best interests. When considering the problem of climate change and our reactions to it, it’s easy to become exasperated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Imo that's a harmful look on this issue. Everyone should contribute, of course, but this will never be enough. The real impact can only come from country/worldwide policy changes. Research your election candidates on those topics and vote!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's not that they're lazy, it's that the cost of the amount of change necessary to make that huge difference cannot be afforded by the vast majority of those 8 billion people. The "small" change mentioned above about upgrading to a more efficient furnace is probably over $1000. And we constantly hear that "56% of Americans can’t cover a $1,000 emergency expense with savings". The problem could have been solved by a bunch of small changes 50 years ago. Then it could have been solved by government intervention 30 years ago. Today, we have such a wealth gap that 8 billion "small" changes (assuming "small" is something most people can actually afford) would add up to something so negligible, it honestly wouldn't be worth the effort.

I'll leave this clip here. We could have solved this with government intervention. The fossil fuel industry made that impossible through lobbying and astroturfing. Now humanity will find out the hard way why it shouldn't ever let that happen again.