this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
661 points (93.4% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2697 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the Dems try to run on status quo they will lose just like when Hillary did the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I dunno, Joe "Nothing will fundamentally change" Biden did OK.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He just did better than Trump. The amount of support Trump still has is ridiculous meaning it's more fervent than before. The reason Trump won originally could be why he wins again (if he makes it through primaries and doesn't get convicted). I don't think Biden can rest on his laurels for the upcoming election. Folks aren't happy and enough of them are either disinterested entirely and won't vote or mistakenly believe Republicans will fix it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am going to be so mad if the DNC decides to bunt on this next election and lets Trump actually win (I'm just going to assume we're still on the worst possible timeline and Trump won't be convicted). In a perfect world the DNC would find an actually good candidate in their couch cushions or something and run them, but since what we have is Biden, at least I don't know, pretend to give a shit about anything. Even if we all know it's bullshit at least promise to fix some stuff. I'm so tired of the Democrats running on campaigns that amount to "We're only 10% evil, so vote for us", while the Republicans campaign on "Vote for us and we'll do our best to legalize everything terrible about the 19th century, but if you're rich white and male, you'll probably be fine".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm less concerned about '24 than I am a '28 "Her Turn" Harris candidate. She hasn't been good or effective as VP and running her in '28 guarantees a Republican win.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The bar unfortunately was in the basement

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Only because he was running against Donald "My entire tenure was a series of increasingly out of control trash fires" Trump. The DNC can't rely on the GOP always running literally the worst possible person. I mean, history seems to show they keep somehow finding a candidate that's even worse than the last guy, but still.

The day both the DNC and GOP run candidates that are actually you know, decent human beings that I'd actually want in charge of anything let alone the country I will be utterly shocked. It's never happened in my lifetime, and I somehow suspect it never will. But man, that sure would be awesome if it happened.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Joe, "If you pay more in taxes nothing will fundamentally change," to a room full of rich assholes Biden, yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's too bad hat quote gets brought up as an anti-Biden thing when it was one of the somewhat cool things he said.

I think the reason is "nothing will fundamentally change" is a pretty accurate description of moderate Democrats, but that particular statement was actually progressive-ish rhetoric. His idea of higher taxes (or more accurately what you'll be taxing) isn't going to match progressives, but they're both sold as "rich people paying their fair share" not ripping their ill-gotten gains away from them.