you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sentience

It basically means “capable of experiencing feelings”

You don’t honestly believe that the plausibilistic text generator is capable of experiencing feelings or emotions do you?

You know what an LLM will do if you spin one up, (bringing it “to life” in your warped perceptions) and then don’t prompt it? Fucking nothing, because it’s software. Shitty software at that.

Try it at home if you don’t believe me, just try not to forget to breathe while your mind is occupied.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    I don't mean linguistically.

    I was always under the impression that it's a complex combination of feelings, perception, experiences, cognition, and self-awareness. Not one simple yes/no definition. Y'know, like what the human brain (and we're seeing more, nonhuman animals' brains) does, but stochastic spicy autocomplete never can do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago

    It’s a word, it is linguistic by nature. I would grant that it is not as simple of a concept as being “alive”, but, like all words it does have a set definition and meaning.

    Your definition is basically correct, but I disagree that possesion of sentience is more than a yes or no.

    There are cases where it is unclear if a life posses sentience, like a jellyfish for example. The great majority of animals do have sentience, I don’t understand why the belief that animals don’t experience emotions and sensations is so prevalent while being so easily disproven. Perhaps it makes them easier to eat.

    You are 1000% correct that shitty slop-generation software cannot be sentient tho.

  • source
  • parent