Local models are meaningfully useful* for agentic work now. This is a realization I came to over the last day or so.

I wrote a lot of custom mods for a game that recently switched engines. The migration is going rather smooth for most people because of wise architectural choices from the dev early on, and because they prioritized backwards compatibility in the update. But there are still some rough edges, especially if you had your hooks deep into the engine.

I recently vibeforked Unbiased Bob's fork of Strata to make it compatible, easy to use and optimized for my OS and hardware (NixOS 5800x3d 64gb, 7900xtx 24gb). Sol 6.1 got it working with Qwen 3.8 Flash Next IQ3 XSS (~75GB) at roughly 46tps 164k ctx with enough headroom to launch a heavy browser along with a triple-A game set to low in 720p for testing when I need to (plus space for zram swap)

I set it up in deepseek harness, gave it a 14MB error log in the game's working directory, then went to sleep. I woke up and it had run for 3 hours. The game launched with only two errors, which it quickly fixed from the new, vastly smaller logfile.

It hammered down every issue, making changes across 30 separate mod repos. Practically a one-shot, and all the features worked as originally intended.

I left a local coding agent running completely on its own for three hours across multiple repos across a dozen auto-compactions with a log file and no ability for it to verify its work besides a compiler. And it produced meaningful results. I can't speak to the code quality, but it worked. This was completely unthinkable even just two years ago. Even one year ago, the cloud frontier wouldn't be able to do this on its own, and now a local model can, running on my consumer gaming hardware from one or two gens back.

“Huh... So... We're here now..." I said to myself, with a bit of stunned disbelief, wondering what the future one or two years from now might hold.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 1 day ago (48 children)

Yeah, we're here. I'm a professional programmer but I haven't written an actual line of code in quite a while now, and I've been having so much fun with my local model (Qwen3.8-27B Q4) doing all sorts of cleanup tasks on my lifetime's giant pile of accumulated files. For example, all my generated music - I ended up having Qwen build a GUI music manager and whipped up a website generator for my favourites so I can more easily share them through free hosts without having to hand them over to spotify or whatever.

I'm curious, is the game you mentioned modding Rimworld? I've been pondering modding it for some time now, it's one of my favourite games, if you've got experience using AI for that I wouldn't mind some pointers. It was always a "I know how to do this stuff but it takes way more time and attention than I've got available right now" sort of task but AI can help so much there. :) Your description of the "engine changed but compatibility is remarkably good" matches what I've seen of Rimworld's recent 1.7 update.

  • source
  • hideshow 48 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 day ago* (5 children)

    Yes, it's Rimworld, you're right! But I don't have many pointers for modding with AI because I'm a rimworld modder and have been since alpha. This was just a huge collection of random forks and one-off personal mods that I wanted to update for 1.7 for a personal run.

    I have also been using frontier models to write game cheats for various games, replacing my miles of handwritten Lua code in cheat engine tables with native injection mods (easiest in unity and ue4, but I also modded an old dosbox game for a friend, and got a bunch of features for assassins creed black flag resynced on the anvil engine). I haven't tried doing that with local models yet, but after seeing these results, I might. I suspect that's code will be substantially worse, though...

    As far as modding Rimworld, because most of its JIT C#/mono, and the game files have a lot of data in them already; it seems like models don't need a lot of hand-holding. I bet downloading the wiki for some additional context would probably be wise, but as far as implementing simple changes, it seems to be perfectly capable with little to no prep. Also I'm using nix so it can get any tooling it needs and set up a dev environment on its own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Okay, thanks. I was hoping it'd be relatively straightforward to get AI up to speed on it, I just wasn't sure where to start or whether it'd be a waste of time if I tried. I just want to give my pawns some interesting diseases and it seemed like a daunting bit of setup to get to that point. I'll take another run at it soon. :)

    Rimworld's an interesting battleground right now in terms of AI, the various fan forums came out strongly against AI and then the new BRUTAL engine came along that incorporates AI-generated code into the base game. So I didn't think I'd get much help from the forums I'm aware of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    Most agents can read websites, you may not need to download it. Just tell it that that wiki has useful information. Maybe include it in the AGENTS.md file so it remembers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

    I imagine my first task for the agent will be to tell it to compile a skill file from all the documentation I'm able to direct it to. I was just hoping that maybe someone had already done that to give it a leg up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (1 child)

    Maybe, skill files are usually for particular tasks though. I have one for code review, another for writing tests, etc.. Documentation usually goes in a different file. It'll depend on what agent you pick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    Yeah, the standards for all that are still new and shifting so I usually just leave it up to the AI itself to figure out how it wants to organize the data. It's the one that knows where its harness tells it to find stuff, after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (41 children)
  • [–] 0 points 4 hours ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    I don’t argue with hacks or people defending using AI. Nor do I engage with whatabout bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 16 hours ago (14 children)

    I made a DOS port of Tetris Attack for the first IBM PC. The audio hardware is a single buzzer. I created the engine for music and sound effects, by hand, from scratch... at 4.77 MHz. I had no idea what I was doing. I still don't. The parts which aren't that-sounds-right repetition are just turning column heights into notes.

    Is that music? That slapdash bespoke effort, in the dire absence of any formal training, on toy hardware? Because if my bullshit counts then I'm not clear how any danceable formulaic realization of proper western music theory would not count... and if my bullshit doesn't count then I'm not sure what the point is in puffing up human effort over perfectly fine artificial results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 15 hours ago (13 children)

    No. lol! It’s not music. It’s computerized sounds. Did you write the music?? Score the different instruments? Wat it your original composition?

    Creating music is a SKILL. A talent that someone sharpened over years of repetition, learning, practice, and love. So, no…. You didn’t make music. You programmed a computer to make sounds that OTHER people created.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    I am the only human being responsible for the audio in that game. There are no other people, fool. Every beat and trill is me using the buzzer as an instrument. If using randomness to fill in some variety is disqualifying, you're picking a fight with the entire medium of process music. Nobody wrote out each performance of "In C" beforehand, so it's only Terry Riley and friends noodling around, yeah?

    Do you think Bobby Prince wasn't a musician, just because he worked in MIDI? He didn't play an actual harpsichord on "Into Sandy's City," so nuh uh, doesn't count. The computer did it! For some reason! Guess it was feeling spooky that morning.

    Or do you simply think bad music is not music? No true Scotsman can make music unless they have skill! Straight up gatekeeping amateur effort. Can amateurs then play music? Does someone fumbling their way through a solo comprise some different process? Because if that's where your philosophy lands, there's a hilarious counterexample in James Hetfield working out "Master Of Puppets."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 5 hours ago* (2 children)

    You’re not a musician. Stop arguing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    I wrote music my-fucking-self in a sound engine I wrote my-fucking-self. Zero AI was involved, you illiterate troll. I built my own goddamn instrument to give my game a soundtrack, within some obscene technical constraints. Fuck your blinding prejudice against anything besides how you were taught.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago (8 children)

    I can pick up a synthesizer which does nothing but produce prerecorded sounds and hit random things till it sounds good. If someone enjoys it they would call it music.

    Slop generated music ain't any different. Music and art as a whole is in the eye of the behold. Only a raging asshole tries to tell people what is or isn't art to them.

    It doesn't have to be art to you. But no one else gives a fuck what you or I or anyone else thinks. Because only their own opinion matters when it comes to what they believe is art.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

    LMAO… the keyboard/synthesiser bullshit? Really?

    No dude. Richard Wright of Pink Floyd was a classically trained pianist. He did not “hit random things till it sounded good”.

    Ffs! What a fucking parhrtic argument!

    No one hits random shit until it sounds good. That’s called noise. You clearly know absolutely nothing about music. Seriously…. Just go sit down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

    Gooseworx hit random shit until it sounded good. She's famously self-taught. Her soundtrack for The Amazing Digital Circus is fantastic.

    What do you think classical training is, besides an effort to explain and share which noises sound good, in a particular context? You'd tell us the first humans to bang rocks together to form a beat weren't really making music, because those cavemen hadn't invented the art degree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

    I’m not arguing this with you. AI is not music and those that use it are not musicians. You’re a hack

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    We're not talking about AI here. Gooseworx is a real human person, who wrote the music for her viral hit show using a normal meatspace electronic keyboard. Or does composition not count unless the keys are made of dead elephant bones?

    You don't know what an argument is. You're just spitting at people and cruising for a moderator's boot up the ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (1 child)

    Music you know well was made from a preset sample. The new akais break copyrighted music into separate stems using generative AI. Illegal by pink pantheress has like a billion plays. That’s like three notes and it DOES sound like she just pressed a few. Listen to it. I’m not a musician but I’m married to one and know a lot. None of them are trained.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (21 children)

    Alright, I used it to organize my AI-generated sounds.

    Feel better? Swapping those words had exactly zero impact on what was actually done. The labels you use don't make any practical observable difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (20 children)

    It make the world of difference to people that actually create music. Imagine you spent your lifetime learning and perfecting a craft, then along comes a kid with a 3d printer and calls himself a craftsman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago* (1 child)

    Typically shit like this is said by people that don’t make art or if they do dont sell it.

    And since you’ve got beef with 3d printers, too. You jelly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 hours ago

    Lmao… typically shit like this told by kids that think they’re musicians because they punched a few adjectives into a prompt. I play three instruments and have been on stage up and down both coasts of the US.

    Talk about jelly some more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

    But that’s not what he said. He didn’t call himself a musician. He said he created music. He did. It’s undeniably music.

    A person 3d printing does not call themselves a craftsman. They say they created objects. And they undeniably create objects.

    I’m sorry you’re struggling with the AI stuff. As a developer, I’ve gone through stages of grief too. I can’t deny reality tho, this is my livelihood. It’s a tool. I use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago*

    Right, the vaguely defensible 'that's not art!' breaks down as we move away from that broad abstract term. People have looked at paintings made by actual human beings and asked: 'but is it art?' You cannot see a Github repository with Claude as an author and scoff, 'that's not code!' For starters: the compiler disagrees.

    An AI render is not a drawing, because nobody drew it, and it's not a photo, because it didn't happen, but anyone insisting it's not an image is playing stupid word games. Like the pixels don't look like anything to them. Saying a sequence of notes in western tuning and 4/4 time with a verse-chorus-verse structure is just "noises" is at least that silly.

    More generally, nobody worth listening to can look at a page of printed words and say, 'that's not a text.' Everything is a fucking text.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 19 hours ago* (4 children)

    It’s not music. And it’s not stages of grief. You like it because it does your job for you. I despise it because it allows talentless hacks to pretend they are my equal when I spent my life on this craft. They’re ruining culture. It’s slop.

    End of story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 child)

    I despise it because it allows talentless hacks to pretend they are my equal when I spent my life on this craft

    It really has been all downhill since the year 2000 when Hampton the Hampster's "The HampsterDance Song" was released, this was PEAK music

    Now just about anyone can release some garbage and it'll go viral eh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    Imagining. In such a situation I'd resist the urge to join a 3d printing forum and interject myself into their conversations with nothing worthwhile to add aside from my "um, actually" semantic quibbling. Because I'm not an ass and if the kid's having a good time more power to him, it's no skin off my back.

    But you do you I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    Yeah, however, imagine that those kids are ruining your industry. But let me guess. You’d be totally fine with that, right?

    You see, It’s hacks like… it’s hacks- that pretend to know what they’re doing by punching adjectives into a prompt and producing artificial music, or artificial art that are taking jobs away from talented people that actually work hard to produce their product.

    And for the record…. I’m not here to get internet points kid, as a musician of stage and studio for over 30 years….

    I’m here to say what needs to be said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

    Yeah, however, imagine that those kids are ruining your industry. But let me guess. You’d be totally fine with that, right?

    In fact, I am.

    I'm a professional programmer. 20 years experience, it's where I earn my money, got a university degree and everything. And we're here in a thread about how not only are AI models good at programming, even small local models are good at programming. I use them myself, I give advice on how to use them, I ask advice on how to use them. I think they're really neat and look forward to using them more, and encourage everyone else to also use them.

    Sure, some people have no idea what they're doing and they end up writing not very good software. My reaction to that is to try to explain to them what they did wrong and how they can get better. Or, if their not-very-good software is still perfectly good for whatever they're using it for, I give them a little thumbs up and say "good on you, just make sure you know what you've got there."

    I’m here to say what needs to be said.

    No, you're here to interject yourself into a conversation that was not at all about AI music to push your personal dislike of AI music and to insult people who don't share your view of AI music.

    It doesn't need to be said. Certainly not here and now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

    Okaybuddy. Not reading all that. AI is for hacks. End of discussion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

    Dude you can just say your an ass and don't like people having fun. It's ok, we have all been 20 before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 15 hours ago* (3 children)

    I absolutely can say you’re and ass. Seems you can’t though.

    Maybe instead of using AI to pretend to make music, you can use it to pretend to learn grammar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Nobody said this about 3D printing, that it was fake sculpting or something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments