818
this is the start of everything falling apart, i can feel it (thelemmy.club)
submitted 4 days ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
288 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
image saying "at least the important software isn't being vibe cod-" (cut off) and showing a graph of em dashes in the linux kernel over time with a sharp rise the past few years
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 3 days ago (34 children)

As someone that uses AI at work because 1. this is a run-out-the-clock situation, and 2. I don’t give a fuck and would like to be at my desk as little as possible, it feels weird and hypocritical to expect no AI in all of the software around me as well.

With that said, if I still had any semblance of passion for writing code, which I do not, anything I worked on for the OSS community would be fully devoid of AI usage. But I’m mentally at a point where I’d rather move to a cabin and use computers less and less with each passing day.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
    •
  • [–] 34 points 3 days ago (13 children)

    There’s also a huge difference between someone like Linus Torvalds, who understands code better than most people on earth, using AI supervised to increase productivity, and Timmy off the street having chatGPT build something he has no clue how it works or what code even does.

    Vibe coding isn’t just using AI. It’s using AI to do things you don’t understand in the first place.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago

    100%. There’s a difference between asking AI to do things that you yourself don’t understand, and using it as a quicker route to something you already know as an engineer. The difference is that the engineer knows when to halt the agent or push back to do something properly. I don’t make AI dabble in languages I don’t already know myself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 days ago (10 children)

    There’s also a huge difference between someone like Linus Torvalds, who understands code better than most people on earth, using AI supervised to increase productivity, and Timmy off the street having chatGPT build something he has no clue how it works or what code even does.

    disagree. there's no difference between the car mechanic or the politician pouring oil into the river. They're both horrendous. sure, one of them might have a reason for doing so, but that reason isn't a good reason.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (9 children)

    Both things are going on at the same time, as Torvalds and Timmy are both paying Sam Altman to pour oil into the river as a byproduct of the service he's providing. For something as important as the Linux kernel, it wasting fewer CPU cycles as a result of LLM-aided optimisation work might even be net beneficial for the environment once you take into account that it'll affect billions of computers for years to come. If the end product is shitty, though, there's no question that it wasn't worth the environmental damage.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (8 children)

    It would have to use trillions of fewer cpu cycles to do that. Currently scientists estimate it at 8 cups of water consumed for every 100 word prompt. What developer do you know that consumes 8 cups of water a day much less every thirty seconds. A developer can sit there and think with their own mind, computer doing nothing, while an LLM consumes thousands of gallons of water and kilowatts of electricity to do the same thing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (7 children)

    It only needs to save a few hundreds of seconds on one computer, or one second on a few hundreds of computers, or a tiny fraction of a second on the number of computers that actually run Linux to save trillions of cycles. A trillion cycles isn't very many at all. A hundred-word prompt on a frontier model running on GPUs in a datacentre burns much more power than a trillion cycles on a CPU, so for a large Linux kernel patch, trillions is the wrong number by many orders of magnitude. There are also a lot of computers spending a lot of time running Linux, so it kind of balances out. There's only one Linus Torvalds, and he's very busy, so it's likely that if he'd not used an LLM to get this work done, it simply wouldn't have happened, even if someone had been willing to fund a different human to do it.

    Either way, the original point of the post was that LLM-generated code is always shitty (even when it's not immediately obvious to whoever's responsible for it that it's shitty) and so having any amount of it already makes things worse, even ignoring the huge environmental cost. With that context, it is the case that there's a huge difference between Timmy and Torvalds as Torvalds is famous for having very high standards, so if he's using it, he might be able to make something that isn't shitty.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (6 children)

    I didn’t realize you were talking about performance in the kernel, which I think will be incredibly hard to measure. That that’s usually the main focus of enterprise investment into Linux, so I very much doubt that an LLM is coming in and making improvements there, but maybe it’s happening. As far as I can tell all the latest things are security scans, which usually will result in worse performance since the goal isn’t speed but safety.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    This comment chain is specifically referencing a single LLM-assisted patch that Linus Torvalds posted to the mailing list for review a few days ago that solves a longstanding performance problem that interacts with enough things parts of the kernel that there are only a handful of people in the world qualified to deal with it, and that none of them have had the time to investigate and fix properly until just now. https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/linus-torvalds-posts-his-first-llm-assisted-patch-to-the-linux-kernel-after-issuing-clear-pro-ai-directives-the-bossman-makes-use-of-ai-tooling-himself

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (4 children)

    Huh.. no it isn’t. This is literally the first time that’s being mentioned in this comment chain. All the way to the top it is only discussing the em-dashes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    It's been headline news (at least by Lemmy standards), so it's a safe bet that Earthwormjim91 was alluding to it when he initially brought up Torvalds, and I was referring to it when I initially brought up optimisation. It wouldn't have been clear to you if you hadn't known about it already, as no one linked an article or said explicitly that that's what they were referring to, but for someone who did, it would have been obvious. You wouldn't expect someone to explicitly say they were referencing Shrek if they said that something had layers or something was sacrifice someone was willing to make when it clearly would only affect other people, and you wouldn't expect someone to explicitly say they were referring to Trump's infamous COVID-era press conference if they mentioned injecting bleach.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    safe bet that Earthwormjim91 was alluding to it when he initially brought up Torvalds

    The image literally is talking about the Linux kernel. Why you would jump to a specific talking point when the post is about the full kernel?

    So no, I think you’re probably the only one thinking this thread was about a specific commit to the kernel.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    Most of this particular comment chain (and it's the post-Earthormjim comment chain I said was referring to that one patch, not the whole thread) has been you replying to me after I started talking about it, so it's been the topic whether or not it's a non-sequitur from the thread as a whole. When one of the participants in a two-person dialogue thinks something's the current topic, that's enough to make it the topic.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 18 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    I felt a lot like that too. I still do, but this helped me a lot:

    Don't take the black pill

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Bookmarking this one for later. Thanks! It’s hard not to feel like my entire field has been cheapened. We spent so long perfecting our craft, only for it to to be completely devalued with speed as the main focus.

    The bright side is that AI will never be as good as me when it comes to CSS. I’m still the go-to CSS person at work, despite folks having AI tools at their disposal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    only for it to to be completely devalued with speed as the main focus.

    Welcome to the rest of the world. All middle managers and C suite dickheads know is "hurry up and get it done," they've entirely lost the concept of "slow is smooth and smooth is fast."

    The middle manager above my direct supervisor regularly clocks in late every day (and that's after a 3h time difference no less, and it doesn't seem he understands timezones either), and then with about 1.5h left in my day suddenly "hey stop what you're doing and get this 3h of work done by the end of the day, but also no you can't work OT." Like "hey dickhead, it's physically impossible to do that," but of course instead of telling him, my direct supervisor just pulls that guy's penis out of his mouth for long enough to say "yes sir" and tell me to break the laws of physics.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    The process has been backward before LLM.

    When we try to get a new customer, they already have a price point for their PCB and a release date that cannot be moved.

    Without knowing what the requests they have will entail.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago*

    I’ve managed to land at a wildly uncommon yet positive company where engineers get to steer a lot of the timelines. We don’t always get what we want, but I feel like we have a better spot at the table than I have at previous jobs where it felt like MBAs and product people set the deadlines in stone before conversations with engineering even started. The only way I’ll leave this job is if they fire me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago

    It's valid to feel that way working in software, but try to hold space also for the fact that computing is 'the means of production' in the information age, and how it is made and who controls it is inherently political.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (11 children)

    I don’t give a fuck and would like to be at my desk as little as possible

    I always had this stance and found it weird when people resisted. Your boss's boss's boss's boss is telling you to work half as much? Whether you think that the output is half as good quality or not why the fuck aren't you JUMPING at the chance to do that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 3 days ago* (8 children)

    It's coming after your job. Why would I want to feed my output into the machine breathing down the back of all our necks? I like what I do. A carpenter isn't going to be happy working in a factory where chairs are made by robot arms. I'm not gonna be happy working in a slop factory

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    Standing in the Mississippi won't dam it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    Your comment was that people should be jumping at the opportunity to use it. I'm telling you why people aren't. Efficicecy is a different thing. Maybe it might be ore apparent to you if you were to say the same thing about outsourcing to oversees rather than outsourcing to AI.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    If enough people do it will.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    Every person on earth could jump in the mississippi and it would flow anyways.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    it most definitely would not. you ever switched the direction of a lazy river? doesn't take that many people. Your ignorance is showing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    You comparing the mississippi to a lazy river is showing your ignorance lmao

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    You literally stated that 8 billion people couldn’t stop the flow of the Mississippi river. Aside from the fact that the Mississippi ebbs and flows from 20 ft wide to a mile wide, 8 billion people take up a lot of mass. 8 billion people could reverse the flow of the river if they wanted.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    I get that your argument is basically "You don't realize how many people 8 billion people is". My argument is "You don't realize how big the mississippi is".

    Bringing up 20ft implies you are including the headwaters which is not my argument. I'm referring to downstream.

    Even if in theory you managed to dam it - the Mississippi is so large and fast moving it would EASILY find another route. Like there would not be a "bay of Mississippi" or whatever.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago

    Whether you think that the output is half as good quality or not why the fuck aren't you JUMPING at the chance to do that.

    Two reasons actually.

    1. Most people want to be productive in some way. Even if you don't like your job very much, its a much bigger mental burden to sit around and do nothing than it is to actually work.

    2. You employer isn't going to pay you the same rate for half as much work done. It is that way now cause they have no idea what the actual productivity will end up being, but once the numbers are stable they will save as much money as possible. You will either be lucky and will work just as much as before with more but worse output, or you will be fired.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago

    I can't use AI in my job, because I manufacture.

    But the HR lady can use it to make policies that are fucking stupid and my direct boss can use it to create an app to more effectively micromanage us without having to actually do the micromanaging himself so he has free time to blow his boss and cook breakfast for 30min on the clock every day.

    So yeah I'm not a fan.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent