you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Being "in the Epstein files" doesn't mean "was on the Island" or "had sex with children". It means their name was mentioned in the files. Often that's because they exchanged emails with Epstein. But, there are people who are "in the Epstein files" because their names were mentioned in an email. There are a few unfortunate people who were "in the Epstein files" because they were mentioned in passing, something like "did you see X's new comedy special?" or "I liked the new book by Y".

In his case, he was in the Epstein files because he sent emails to Epstein, essentially begging for an invite to a party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    The funniest one for me as an Australian was Kevin Rudd, former PM. From everything there, it seems Epstein wanted to gain influence by donating to an NGO run by Rudd, and kept inviting him to stuff, and Rudd kept declining. Eventually he made an unsolicited donation and it got handed back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    It's strange how sometimes, rarely, "being in the Epstein files" can actually prove your good character.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    Norman Finkelstein is a good example. Some guy kept copying him in to emails with Epstein which he ignored. Eventually he quoted the testimony of one of Epstein's victims and essentially said he would throttle Epstein to death if she was his own daughter.

  • source
  • parent