Police confirmed they had responded to a report of "criminal mischief involving a robot" on the 1200 block of Filbert Street around 1:16 p.m. on Wednesday. A woman on the scene ignored "multiple commands" to move, they said, resulting in a criminal violation notice for disorderly conduct.

Uber declined to comment.

Marvin, who plans to contest the charge on the grounds of her First Amendment right to protest, has been undeterred by the arrest. She plans to continue blocking Uber Eats robots and chatting with curious passersby who ask what she's doing.

"It allows me to talk to people about what's going on," she said. "It's always very interesting conversations that we have, and I think it's good to have those kinds of conversations in public space."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 23 hours ago

Except they don't... because whether you block a human or a robot, you'll be arrested. Just like the article says.

This lady is arguing that robots should not have that right. So comparing it to a wheelchair bound person is not an acceptable comparison. It should be between other robots, and what rights they should be given, considering that is what is being discussed

  • source
  • parent