Up to you whether you want to limit your answer to software that is possible/realistic

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 hours ago (1 child)

My point is that people would have an incentive to bet for the fire and then cause the fire, so once a bet is published chances are that the fire will happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 32 minutes ago

    There would need to be sufficient market depth to pay someone to act. So we couldn't just publish $0.01 bets on everything and watch the town burn. "Coasian" solutions like this are limited by transaction costs.

    In practice, the owner of the datacenter would need to either eliminate the externality or watch it burn. If the datacenter is worth more than its external cost, then they can reimburse their victims or pay for cleanup. If the revenue from the datacenter is less than its external costs, then it's a net loss for society and ought to be shut down.

  • source
  • parent