you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why does there have to be a "but" there? He didn't do any of the engineering, so fuck him regardless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

    Unfortunately he paid the engineers to make this stunt for the sole purpose of increasing his wealth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

    I don't think it's going to work out for him this time, but I've been wrong before

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    Yeah, concluding that from 1 day’s worth of trading is brave. Last 5 years or so shows much more volatility but still generally upwards… I can’t be bothered to see what those general spikes align with.

  • source
  • parent