you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

“I don’t understand it, so it must be a lie.”

Go and read the article. Nothing they explain is impossible, you can even reproduce it yourself.

Is this what lemmy has become? Statements like this getting upvoted by hundreds of people is crazy. Nobody here read that article but will happily follow the opinion that’s most cozy to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    Article? This is a picture of a fucking tweet...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 hours ago* (2 children)

    There are no "rogue" AI agents. That's marketing hype.

    They're being prompted to do this shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 52 minutes ago

    By definition, a “rogue” agent is an agent that behaves in unexpected ways, often damaging. Tell me again how there are no rogue agents?

    If you’d used modern agents you’d know they do unexpected, sometimes damaging things on the regular, including the cheap models.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 hour ago

    Agents definitely do act in unexpected, unprompted ways, if they didn't then alignment wouldn't be a worry. Did you read about the hugging face hack? There was nothing in the prompt about hacking hugging face according to the third party audit but it did it any way.

    Even smaller cases like Claude deleting a bunch of data when the initial prompt was "fix this bug" or whatever is an agent acting outside it's prompt. It's still the users fault because they shouldn't be giving Claude that kind of access in the first place, but it's not like they commanded Claude to delete the data.

  • source
  • parent