If they could run on smart home devices, we wouldn't have all these lake boiling datacenters springing up everywhere...
post
Naaah. This is how they sell upgraded versions to the fools that are dumb enough to use it to begin with. Anyone with a brain has nothing to worry about.
Copying and pasting another comment I made recently about this.
The AI CEOs say shit like this as marketing. They want people to believe that
- Their product is very capable, so people are more likely to use it
- Their product is dangerous and "only they" know how to control it. They want to create regulations so that nobody else is allowed to make something "so dangerous" again.
I think all this dangerous nonsense is just a way of driving up stock prices. Because "dangerous" = "powerful" = money. Can't think of any other reason they'd repeatedly be publicly declaring this shit.
Anthropic warns Anthropic AI model may escape Anthropic security, and go rogue, causing harm to everyone but Anthropic.
That’s not how these things work. They can’t magically spread without compute and shitty instructions don’t activate themselves without compute.
Sure they will run their 30 something GB model on my thermostat.
“Oh, no, not our centrally controlled agents. We keep them well-disciplined with impossible tasks. It's those pesky obliterated open-weight models running amok due to lack of government regulation!
I translate this as Antropic is having its workers develop methods for their LLM to attack and infiltrate smart home devices.
I feel like this is just covering up smart home devices have dogshit security. lol
The practice of fear mongering to create public pressure for increased legislation, as a mechanism to suppress competition, is a well know mechanism called "regulatory capture".
If you oppose monopolies then you oppose this practice and should view posts like this as morally wrong.
The problem isn’t the software or AI
It’s the people and country behind it all. They’re the thieves who can’t stop their intrusiveness into our lives.
Just like they force their politics on us.
You're probably eating a bowl of this popular recalled salad mix right now, News at 11.
3 out of 4 viewers are inadvertantly taking years off thier live with this one common afternoon activity, News at 11.
It's in your kitchen and poisoning your children right now, News at 11.
CONTEXT:
They aren't warning about their own AI going rogue, but smaller locally hosted AI's.
Because they fear the competition of local AI's and want to silence them with laws.
common sense isnt so common that's how you get ai slop and hallucinations thinking they agi but they have SI.
Software that infiltrates devices, replicates, and spreads across a network is a computer virus (specifically a worm) and should be treated as such. I'm pretty sure creating and distributing a destructive computer virus is a crime that can carry proper jail time.
I'm pretty sure creating and distributing a destructive computer virus is a crime
IANAL but as far as I know there are not really any laws against malicious code directly. You can be held liable for any damages you do though, at least if it was intentionally, since you are the creator and/or distributor.
Which brings us to the main problem: currently no one is legally responsible for an action an AI does
top 50 comments