you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

Dude even the anti-Stalin-biased Wikipedia article on that admits in the second paragraph that veil-burnings were voluntary, which I am not against. (It also said they hired gangs to rip the veils off of women, but that sounds like the most obvious propaganda I've ever heard)

Anyway, thank you for informing me, I did not know that. I guess I disagree with 1929 Stalin then, but I still agree with 1920 Stalin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    The hujum was a campaign for the cause of liberation explicitly confronting religion. I am not condemning the hujum.

    I guess I disagree with 1929 Stalin then, but I still agree with 1920 Stalin

    If Stalin disagreeing with you doesnt change your tune, then the original invocation of Stalin was meaningless.

  • source
  • parent