cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/60115513

Archived

Prosecutors on Sept. 29 indicted two men for allegedly throwing feces and paint at the Comedy Club in Taipei on May 29. A 33-year-old man surnamed Liu (劉), allegedly acting on instructions from an unidentified person in China, recruited a 35-year-old man surnamed Kuo (郭), who threw bags containing human feces and white paint inside and outside the club in Zhongshan District (中山), prosecutors said.

The incident happened on a night when comedian Huang Yi-hao (黃逸豪), who had mocked Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), was scheduled to perform.

Property was damaged, staff were frightened and some customers sought refunds, prosecutors said.

It was an act of Chinese “transnational repression” intended to restrict freedom of expression, they said, recommending that Liu be given a prison term of one year and 10 months, and Kuo one year and eight months.

[...]

It was not the first time people apparently acting on behalf of Beijing have been accused of trying to intimidate or silence critics in Taiwan. In 2017, Hong Kong democracy advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) was targeted by pro-China protesters, including in an alleged attempted assault, upon his arrival at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport.

In 2019, Hong Kong singer and democracy advocate Denise Ho (何韻詩) was splashed with red paint while speaking to reporters before a rally in Taipei to support the territory’s democratic movement.

Prosecutors identified the main suspect as a member of the China Unification Promotion Party.

Other Hong Kong rights workers have also faced harassment. In 2020, former Causeway Bay Books manager Lam Wing-kee (林榮基), who had fled to Taiwan, was splashed with paint at a Taipei cafe.

Security officials have said that attacks and vandalism targeting Hong Kongers and their businesses in Taiwan are suspected of being carried out under Chinese direction.

[...]

Economic pressure is another avenue of intimidation. This week, TV host Kevin Tsai (蔡康永) attended a campaign event in Taipei for Shen, who is the DPP’s mayoral candidate for the capital. After Chinese social media users called for a boycott, Chinese electric-vehicle maker Leapmotor removed promotional material featuring Tsai, while Harper’s Bazaar China took down its interview with him.

These incidents show the potential consequences for Taiwanese entertainers and businesses that operate in China when Beijing interprets their political activity as support for “Taiwanese independence.”

[...]

Political satire and making fun of politicians are generally lawful and strongly protected forms of expression.

Huang’s political satire of Xi and other politicians is protected by Taiwan’s constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression. Taiwanese must not be intimidated into self-censorship. If fear of Beijing causes people to silence themselves, Taiwan risks surrendering the freedoms that distinguish its democratic system from the Chinese regime while encouraging further attempts at transnational repression.

That is why prosecutors and courts must continue to hold accountable those who use threats, violence or other criminal acts to silence others. Defending free expression does not mean allowing intimidation to go unanswered; it means ensuring that intimidation never determines what Taiwanese are allowed to say.

Ultimately, Taiwanese — not Beijing — will decide what can be said in Taiwan. The nation’s democracy is strong when its people exercise the freedoms they fought hard for, rather than allowing fear of China to dictate the limits of their speech.

[...]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

China doesn't have a veto on recognizing countries because it's not a function of the Security Council

Don't be so slippery buddy, China does not have the power to veto the recognition but it does have a veto on their application to start their recognition in the first place.

I am very tired of this specious debate. No it's not. There is no "facto" of being a country. There is only "jure".

Cool story bro, you keep believing that and Taiwan will just carry on being de facto a country.

facto" a country are anti-comnunists

Imagine in 2026 believing China is a communist country? Sure buddy, communist country with the fastest growing population of billionaires on earth!

purge tens of thousands of political dissidents for 3 generations

Come on China boy, don't get me started on China and political dissidents, we will be here all day! Sure, the Uyghurs are just volunteering for re-education!

The original article was regarding China's lame attempt at shutting down criticism by throwing paint and faeces. China really is the most thin skinned country on earth, if they had any confidence as a nation they wouldn't feel the need to do this. You then lamely linked an article to Taiwan's historic censorship in a lame attempt at whataboutism. Your Wikipedia article was absolutely unnecessary and irrelevant to the article, it would have looked weird to add that context to the story.

No one gives a shit where you would choose to live.

Yes they do, I have lots of family and friends that love me and care where I am. I lived in Hong Kong for a while back when it was cool and have family that had to flee when China came in and made it lame and authoritarian.

China's position on Taiwan has literally been the same for 50 fucking years - they will never invade Taiwan to force integration militarily

Yea Russia also said they wouldn't invade Ukraine, even signed agreements but here we are, authoritarian states do what they do. It is no secret that China has ambitions to reunite Taiwan with the mainland, they have multiple motives. If China had a clear way to take Taiwan they would simple as that. The Chinese leadership is fortunately more pragmatic than that fool Putin and the disastrous war in Ukraine has definitely frightened China off the idea of taking Taiwan militarily any time soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 2 weeks ago

    Your understanding of politics is about what one expect from an American high schooler. The UN resolution recognizing One China is very clear. The article about current day censorship in Taiwan is also very clear. The fact that it provides historical context does not mean Taiwan does not continue to do censorship.

    Back when [Hong Kong] was cool

    Was that before or after the British realized they had to develop an anti-communist movement in their, now former, colony. Presumably after. If you had family that had to flee, they were either European colonizers or they were working for the Europeans, either way, not exactly winning any points with anyone who understands history.

  • source
  • parent