It looks like such beautiful place

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 23 hours ago* (19 children)

Japan is lucky enough to be next to China, so by absorbing their culinary traditions they actually have edible food, unlike the Anglos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 23 hours ago* (18 children)

    not just borrowing China but homegrown culinary innovations are also extremely good; this is because Japan didn't become a colonizer until the modern era, whereas England's ancient status as the oldest-extant colonizer means their food culture has atrophied beyond all hope of recovery

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago (17 children)

    Genuinely: what are some homegrown culinary innovations?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

    MEAT mentionsUnagi Don is delicious and also hilariously expensive. Eel is very good when prepared by being barbequed.

    Katsudon and Oyakodon are both interesting as they're also very tasty due to the inclusion of dashi when setting the eggs.

    They've done some culinary crimes to spaghetti that I support.

    Japanese Curry is actually kind of its own thing, being more of a stew with a finishing roux. It is basically taken straight from India though I think(?) its become its own thing now.

    Did they invent natto? That's not a good thing necessarily but they might've done it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago* (1 child)

    i thought japanese curry was one of those "white people foods" from the meiji era that japanese people thought was the reason white people were big and tall and successful. so because the brits looked at the rich and extremely varied culinary traditions of india and said "it's all bits of veg in yellow gravy innit" and then made a dish called curry consisting of bits of veg in yellow gravy, the japanese saw the british sailors eat that and made their own version

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 21 hours ago (13 children)
  • [–] 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

    Ramen is Chinese, the Japanese term comes from "la mien" in Chinese or pulled noodles. Alcoholic fermentation of rice spread to Japan from China, and sushi is likely of southeast Asian origin, with the first written record of sushi-like food from 4th century BCE in China, all of this according to Wikipedia. English Wikipedia does credit mochi being japanese, I'd be surprised if this is actually the case, I found a SCMP headline claiming mochi were introduced from China in 300BCE, pointing to Taiwan's "moâ chi" and Hong Kong's "log máih chih" type of rice snacks.

    Most foods we attribute to Japanese culture are Chinese in origin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 14 hours ago

    yeah, indigenous people in taiwan have been making mochi since before the japanese occupation (but I don't know if they were called moachi before that), maybe it spread to japan through the ryukus, or was invented independently. pounding rice and other starches in a big mortar with a big long stick is a thing all arouns southern and western china and southeast asia and africa

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 21 hours ago (9 children)

    3/4 have their origins outside of Japan lmfao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 21 hours ago (8 children)

    That may be true but I don't believe it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    Those foods are to Japan as hamburgers and pizza are to america: foreign dishes adopted & altered to an extent that many people think of them as the cuisine of the adopter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 20 hours ago

    that's dialectics baby

    food is not delivered metaphysically whole and unaltered then persists unchanged throughout time; all traditions are rooted elsewhere to some extent, and their adaptation to local conditions is what creates a genuine local identity

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

    Well, imagine saying "no, actually pierogi are of German origin, and corn tortillas are of USAmerican origin too!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 20 hours ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

    No, it is true of "Japanese" food though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    Japanese food is German and USAmerican? Makes sense given their shared fascist histories, I suppose!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 19 hours ago

    Most historical food (and customs, and architecture, and artstyles, and drinks...) attributed to Japan are actually Chinese in origin.

    Hell, even taxonomy has this issue, with many species being called Japonica but being indigenous to China! Camellia Japonica, even Japonica rice, one of the two big cultivars, is actually from China originally!

    This is a problem because it erases Chinese identity and history in favour of their recent colonisers, which is actually politically convenient to anticommunism too.

  • source
  • parent