You all have spoken, and we have listened. The team and I, as well as Lemmy.world Admins, have come to an agreement that any artist/comic that is deemed to be transphobic, racist, or in any other way demonstrates bigotry toward any group or minority will be removed from circulation. We will keep a list of banned artists in the sidebar and update it as new artists are uncovered.

Now, let's discuss details:

  1. You the reporter have the burden of proof for why an artist or comic breaks this rule; ΒΈ "they're fascist/racist/sexist/it's Tuesday" is not sufficient
  2. Repeated posting of banned artists will result in progressive punishment/moderated actions, up to being permanently banned
  3. Think Paradox of Tolerance when determining what bigotry means; e.g.,
    • Demeaning conservatives or other politicians (e.g., Devil's Panties) is not rule breaking
    • Demeaning women, the LGBTQ+ community, etc is rule breaking
    • Anything we consider to be a bad faith post, or trying to skirt the rules because of some perceived loophole

The current list of banned artists include:

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

This is not an all-encompassing list, and are subject to moderator's (and admin's) final decisions. Questions, feedback, and playful banter are always welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (3 children)

We do our best to include the community in major decisions such as this. But keep in mind that some decisions will be made via the mod team, and if/when necessary the .world admin team.

While we hope to make the right decisions* that the majority of the community will agree with, we accept that not everyone will be happy with what we do or say.

Re our subcontracted despotism: anyone who does not like how this community is run is free to (respectfully) voice their concerns (such as you did just now), and if that does not satisfy their concerns, they are welcome to create their own subcontracted-despotic community and run it how they see fit (obviously within the confines of whichever ToS applies to the instance is they create it on).

* Terms and conditions apply; while supplies last; batteries not included.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (2 children)

    But what of my idea for providing a modicum of justicely due process and transparency? The document justifying the ban. That was my point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    You do realize you’re commenting in what essentially is a document that we created to explain why we banned the currently banned artists?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Yeah I get that. It needs to provide the evidence too but ya.

    My point was that such (explanation + evidence) would be provided for every instance of banning. That was not made explicit in your post and that's why I brought it up.

  • source
  • parent