M said it best (thelemmy.club)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 4 weeks ago* (12 children)

Nah, dinosaurs are cool. He's a sexist, misogynist pig.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Nah, pigs are cool and really smart.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    How about "He's a sexist, misogynist, racist, child rapist Oompa Loompa"? Or do we have someone prepared to defend the little orange men, now, too?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    I mean,. they were basically slaves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 weeks ago* (2 children)

    fucks sake I can't win with you lot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Saying sexist and misogynistic together is redundent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Not necessarily: pretty sure people might argue that saying princesses are just for girls, for example, is sexist, but not misogynistic. Depends on the context ig. In the quote above, putting them together is about emphasis on the negative more than anything, so it does serve some purpose, even if the meaning is similar

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    But if that were the case, it would be possible to be sexist, without being misogynistic. Or vice versa, how would that work? I cannot discriminate against women, if I don't think that they'd be worse than men in some way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment