you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Not necessarily: pretty sure people might argue that saying princesses are just for girls, for example, is sexist, but not misogynistic. Depends on the context ig. In the quote above, putting them together is about emphasis on the negative more than anything, so it does serve some purpose, even if the meaning is similar

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    But if that were the case, it would be possible to be sexist, without being misogynistic. Or vice versa, how would that work? I cannot discriminate against women, if I don't think that they'd be worse than men in some way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment