you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 hours ago (7 children)

That doesn't make sense. We're not looking for your comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 hours ago (6 children)

    He said he would like to see one case of this happening... a comment would demonstrate that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (5 children)

    No, he said he would like to see an example of an .ml user calling Putin progressive. Are you drunk?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 hour ago* (4 children)

    Could we please not resort to ad hominem attacks and insults, "Nonconfrontational"? This isn't Reddit.

    Logically, I don't follow where that was specifically asked, but here's a comment calling Putin's Russia progressive: https://lemmy.ml/comment/27815508

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (3 children)

    So that's actually calling Russia a reactionary nationalist state playing a progressive role in the context of a war between the imperial global hegemony, lol.

    Do you have any examples of someone calling Putin progressive or not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    As you acknowledge, it quite clearly states Putin's Russia plays a "progressive role."

    I'd like you to apologize to me for calling me "drunk." It was ad hominem and has no place in discourse.

    Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia bombed children's hospitals and bankrolled Trump Jr's wedding. If you and I are against imperialism, we should be against all of these things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 53 minutes ago (1 child)

    Putin's Russia playing progressive role

    =/=

    Putin is progressive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 19 minutes ago

    Progressive is an adjective in this context. Your characterization is misleading and incorrect.

    OP clearly supports Putin's Russia as a perceived bullwark against NATO.

    I didn't catch your apology for the ad hominem. Kindly reply herewith

  • source
  • parent