you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 8 hours ago (24 children)

I would show you, but mods deleted all my comments! Just criticize Putin, Stalin or Kim Jogn Un in the socialism.ml or memes.ml instance and you'll instantly have -10 downvotes and probably a ban

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago (8 children)

    That doesn't make sense. We're not looking for your comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 hours ago (7 children)

    He said he would like to see one case of this happening... a comment would demonstrate that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago (6 children)

    No, he said he would like to see an example of an .ml user calling Putin progressive. Are you drunk?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago* (5 children)

    Could we please not resort to ad hominem attacks and insults, "Nonconfrontational"? This isn't Reddit.

    Logically, I don't follow where that was specifically asked, but here's a comment calling Putin's Russia progressive: https://lemmy.ml/comment/27815508

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

    So that's actually calling Russia a reactionary nationalist state playing a progressive role in the context of a war between the imperial global hegemony, lol.

    Do you have any examples of someone calling Putin progressive or not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

    As you acknowledge, it quite clearly states Putin's Russia plays a "progressive role."

    I'd like you to apologize to me for calling me "drunk." It was ad hominem and has no place in discourse.

    Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia bombed children's hospitals and bankrolled Trump Jr's wedding. If you and I are against imperialism, we should be against all of these things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    Putin's Russia playing progressive role

    =/=

    Putin is progressive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    Progressive is an adjective in this context. Your characterization is misleading and incorrect.

    OP clearly supports Putin's Russia as a perceived bullwark against NATO.

    I didn't catch your apology for the ad hominem. Kindly reply herewith

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (14 children)

    lmao pointing out that the US has more people imprisoned than the USSR is not a mossad psyop

    I am glad that people like you get banned

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

    That was not the comment I was banned for, and you know it.

    80% of that figure weren't imprisoned, they were on probation! Clearly misinformation when you look at the facts... that upsets Stalinists.

    Have a sense of humor!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago* (12 children)

    Its awesome how these people can just make up bullshit and never get punished on their instance.
    I suppose thats a universal issue, but its still egregious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago (10 children)

    literally every time someone is like 'woe is me the tankies got me, all i did was speak truth to power' i look at the modlog and it's them insulting people or being a reactionary

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 hours ago (9 children)

    The only insult is your support of Putin and Stalin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago* (8 children)

    oh yeah i almost forgot, making up wild accusations is another thing i see in the modlogs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 hours ago (7 children)

    So we're in agreement that one should not be banned for expressing a negative opinion of the USSR?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago (6 children)

    there's plenty of criticism of the USSR, Stalin, Putin in these spaces.

    people who are lazily ragebaiting and accusing people of being mossad for criticism of the US prison-industrial complex do get banned though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago (5 children)

    Criticism of the USSR, Stalin, and Putin is deleted in ml instances. My deletion history proves it.

    The representation was inaccurate, as 80% of the 1996 US figure quoted were on probation, not incarcerated.

    It's not lazy ragebaiting to verify facts, is it?

    And since you're such an expert, which Lemmy user in particular, was insulted? Why is the mere assertion that one works on behalf of an intelligence service considered an insult by a disinterested observer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

    ... you realize parole is still part of the carceral state right

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Probation is distinct from parole in the US legal system. Shall I provide you with a source to clarify the difference?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    typo on my part, the point is the same. both are still parts of the carceral state.

    that the US has got better at managing more people through its carceral system with less visible imprisonment is not the flex that you think it is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago

    Criticism of the US prison system is warranted but we must ensure that it is accurate, no?

    It's strange to me that you think I'm flexing. Aren't we essentially arguing the same thing: that all humans have the right to live in decency?

  • source
  • parent