you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 169 points 1 month ago (99 children)

Plus, they dropped Callaway Golf after their horrific ad depicting violence against women.

Wait... What?

  • source
  • hideshow 99 child comments
  • [–] 231 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (34 children)

    The golf club company ran an ad where a woman went to touch a golf club and her man pushed her down and threatened her for her transgression.

    Costco stopped carrying their clubs in response

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 month ago* (29 children)

    Does the US not have some kind of advertising standards board that you have to get adverts approved before you're allowed to publicly post them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 191 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    We don’t have standards keeping the ass parasites out of the lettuce, take a second and ponder

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Thank god it's just lettuce though... Right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    We generally presume companies will choose not to do that to their own reputations, but apparently that presumption was wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    With economies of scale you end up with basically one producer producing stuff for incredibly cheap. Take poultry for example, Tyson is like the only name you'll see at major retailers. Even most store brands are just relabeled Tyson product. So it really doesn't matter to them if they get a couple people sick, cause we're else you gunna go? Blackbird farms, and pay $38 a chicken? Not the very large majority of price sensitive people living paycheck to paycheck.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (19 replies)
  • [–] 63 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    To be fair, it wasn't Callaway directly. It was Good Good Golf, a golf youtube channel, that aired the ad. Callaway had a partnership with them to cobrand the golf club, but dropped Good Good immediately after the ad and canceled the branded club.

    Callaway still deserves the backlash from associating with them though and apparently someone giving the ok for the ad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 90 points 1 month ago (45 children)

    Video of the ad.

    It's such a gross concept. Wild anyone thought this was a funny, gotta be pretty deep in bro to not see red flags.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Like what is the point they are trying to make even?

    Is the club so fragile that it'll break if touched?

    Golfers are seriously superstitious?

    Women suck and can't golf?

    If anything it would have been a better commercial to do the opposite, hand the club out to literally everyone that's playing and they all hit better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    I mean, ‘golf company owner’ is already selecting for the biggest chud in existence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Personally I think that if you set out to invent the most boring sport you wouldn't be able to beat golf but I accept that some people strangely do find it attractive and they're not all toxic masculinity "alpha" types, so they should really have seen that one coming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I don't like golf, but at least it gives you an afternoon's walk in something resembling nature

    Cricket on the other hand, takes a week to play and is just running back and forth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    There is absolutely nothing about a golf course that resembles nature. It’s nothing but chemicals and underpaid guys with gas fume belching machines.

    If you want a wandering outdoor sport with real nature, try out frisbee golf or field archery. They also have the bonus of not destroying habitats and polluting local waterways with way too much nitrogen fertilizer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Aye and no. Don't get me wrong, golf courses are as you say fertiliser polluted and lacking in biodiversity. But the rough, surrounding the whole course, and the woods they're often placed in certainly resemble nature. There's still birds, foxes, squirrels, etc, going about.

    Certainly in Scotland at least, which is my only personal experience of courses. And being the home of golf I don't think it's disingenuous for me to use that as a basis for the claim.

    I have seen videos and pictures of courses in places like Florida though and if a Scottish course is a tragedy of nature, a Florida course is an abomination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm NGL, initially i thought "This is probably one of those wacky ads taken out of context." And no, it's really really super gross. There's nothing humorous about it, it's just a really serious ad about pushing down and threatening a woman who touches your golf club.

    It wouldn't be any better if the victim was a man either. The fact that there's no other words except 'the victim' is telling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    That was so much more fucked up than I expected. This has to be intentional, it is very hard to believe that anyone thought this made for a good commercial in any way other than to appeal to chuds who enjoy violence against women. It is blatant and explicit, the mask is off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    Even if it was a guy pushing another guy I don't see how that would've ever been a funny spoof skit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (16 children)

    There was no way to salvage this.

    Say the guy had just grabbed the woman's arm or put his arm in front of her to stop her instead. You still have that threat he makes towards her.

    Even if that threat was changed to "no one touches my club except me", you still have that underlying implication of a threat.

    There's no universe that could've salvaged this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Looked it up, apparently they did an Obsession parody, but no one got the reference so it looked like the CEO of the company just pushed a woman to the ground for trying to touch his golf clubs.

    I've seen the ad, I didn't get the reference either. I haven't seen Obsession, but apparently that's what that was in reference to.....

    If you have to be told what the reference is, you're probably not doing references right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    I honestly don't give a fuck if it was a reference to something, depicting violence against women to protect your fucking golf clubs from cooties or whatever is wildly unacceptable. The fact that even the script got approved is mind boggling, let alone that the shoot, editing, and distribution all pushed it through.

    Callaway and Good Good Golf are now on my 'never buy, even used or on sale' list.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Na, I'm cool with buying second hand preemo stuff. My money isn't going to them, and no one is going to notice the logo flying 300 yards through the air.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Thank you for the context! I've seen the ad in passing and really for the life of me, couldn't understand why anyone thought that was a good idea. Now I kinda get it. It's still terrible, but at least it's not just "haha, hurting women funny".

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)