Get your shortnames while the getting's good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 253 points 3 weeks ago* (51 children)

I hope this takes off and people start using "tweet" and "twitter" again and it makes "x" completely irrelevant like his Hitler salute should have

Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I'm out

  • source
  • hideshow 51 child comments
  • [–] 172 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (14 children)

    Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out

    Well, they need something to pay the lawyers with once Musk takes notice.

    Edit: I've just discovered this interesting concept called "reading the article" and found out that they've already been sued, though it's still not entirely settled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 121 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    I’ve just discovered this interesting concept called “reading the article”

    Spread the word my brother! You've got to let everyone know about this new fad!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    I read it but honestly, probably 80% of the time I do not. Because articles are very often full of pop ups and ads and tracking and paywalls, and are unnecessarily verbose (most can be summarized in 1-2 sentences), and are just republishing someone else's work while adding nothing, and simultaneously devoid of useful information or any actual sources.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Some of that can be solved with Firefox and unblock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    100% can be solved by knowingly making a glaringly obviously false claim about the topic and someone will correct you in a dickish tone while citing the article

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Edit: I've just discovered this interesting concept called "reading the article"

    Jokes aside: I think it's great that you read the article, then went back to both acknowledge that it covered your point and admit that you didn't before.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 80 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    https://twitter.now/

    vibe coded slop asking for $20 bucks to sign up.. i think I'm okay

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I don't think I've ever seen that many em dashes ever. Not even in the most copy/paste AI slop wall of text. Holy moly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago*

    Wow you were not kidding. Some of them are extra awkward and unnatural too, it's almost a parody of what slop text looks like.

    We believe people should have more control over what they see — and more transparency about the information in front of them.

    An early illustration of the idea — you decide how much low-trust noise reaches your feed:

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 3 weeks ago* (4 children)

    Edit: it cost $20 to join?! I’m out

    They probably need the money to pay for their AI-based "fact-checking":

    A new and notable feature is the automated fact-checking tool, a Gemini-based “veracity engine for real-time analysis” (“Vera” for short), which runs on every tweet.

    Using a technology that's known for making shit up, for fact-checking, is so dumb, but it will probably bring in investors because AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Do they expect everything posted to be just news and information that can be fact-checked? Is this AI going to fact-check my opinions and shitposts too?

    The homepage feels like AI slop too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Are we sure it’s not mostly still bots on Twitter? I deleted my account back then and have not been back.

    At least, not willingly back, since some people still hyperlink to Twitter directly rather than just sharing screenshots of whatever the content was. So you click the text hyperlink thinking it’s to a web article, only for it to bring you to some random string of tweets visibly displayed in the least logical order.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

    people start using “tweet” and “twitter” again

    I never stopped

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    it cost $20 to join?! I'm out

    Yep, I can't spend the money now, which is probably true for a lot of people, and I'm definitely gonna forget this is a thing by the time it's free or I have the money, which is probably true for a lot of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)