202
submitted 1 day ago by Amuletta@lemmy.ca to c/offbeat@lemmy.ca

So if you have no change you get locked out of your home?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Every building has numerous features. Every feature will be used by some people more than others. If you want to start charging for access to one of these features, you really should charge for all of them. And then you've completely dismantled the original social contract people were agreeing to when they bought their condo or signed an apartment lease. I wouldn't mind an "a la carte" condo where you had to pay for the elevator, pay for the pool, pay for the dog park, etc. If that was how the whole building worked, and how it was announced and intended to work from the beginning? Fine. I won't live in such a building, but if you go into it with eyes open and don't mind? Fair enough.

The problem is the bait-and-switch. If you want to start charging for the elevator, existing condo owners or renters should be grandfathered in and be allowed to use it without a fee, perhaps through some sort of keycard system.

[-] jonzobot@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Or just the main charges that make sense, like the elevator and small number of big-ticket items? If charging separately for the elevator means everyone pays a reduced rent (or building costs if you own the unit), and then pays their elevator charge separately, I don't see why this is so bad. It would only be a bait and switch if you are using the elevator more, and if so, it also provides some financial incentive to change behaviour to the extent you can.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Do you know the definition of a bait and switch?

[-] jonzobot@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Please enlighten me. Isn't a bait and switch a thing only if you wind up paying more, unexpectedly and by fraudulent design?

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Exactly. People bought condos or signed leases with the agreement that the elevator costs would be shared. Now folks want to renege on that agreement after-the-fact. It's a classic bait-and-switch.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
202 points (98.1% liked)

Offbeat

1918 readers
450 users here now

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS