104
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Captain_Baka@feddit.org 12 points 13 hours ago

Solar+battery is not an actual thing. We're talking society scale here, not remote cabin.

https://www.pv-magazine.de/2026/08/13/batteriespeicher-mit-rund-500-megawattstunden-kapazitaet-in-sachsen-anhalt-eingeweiht/

Germany opened a new battery storage just this week. It has so much capacity that it can power a city like Leipzig over a night completely. And there are plans to upgrade it from 500 megawatthours to 800 megawatthours before 2026 ends. That's not just remote cabin scale to me.

Hydro, although great in many ways, causes immense ecological devastation and is not suitable for all places.

Okay, here i gotta agree with you.

Nuclear also has issues but a mix of wind+solar on a base of hydro+nuclear is probably the ideal.

"Issues". Yeah. The deadly waste nuclear plants produce is just a minor "issue". And I'm not even talking about safety in general (Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three Mile Island).

[-] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 13 hours ago

You named 3 incidents. Now name all nuclear power plants ever. Compare the numbers.

[-] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

I'm not even necessarily against nuclear, but this is a weird argument. How many times have solar panels blown up and made entire cities uninhabitable for decades, and how many are there total in use ever?

The percentage of failures of nuclear power plants may be low, but the fallout (literally) is incredibly devastating.

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub -2 points 13 hours ago

I'm sure batteries will play an important role in the future, but it's not significant today and I don't see any indication of this changing rapidly in a meaningful way. I'd love to be wrong though.

Regarding the issues with nuclear power, the ecological impact is far better than hydro and health impact/deaths is also significantly better. I'm not trying to badmouth hydro here, but I think it's important to be fair and acknowledge that on those two issues (ecological impact, human health) nuclear has a better track record.

[-] Hellgruen@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago
[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 10 hours ago

For context, global energy output is 30k TWh/year. That's T for tera.

[-] Hellgruen@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

For context, that’s growth, not total capacity. And after covid one would suspect ppl would understand exponential growth and to understand what that means for a business Modell $$$

Also we don’t need capacity for the whole output of a year.

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 9 hours ago

For even more context, the annual growth in electricity output is about 5x the addition of battery capacity.

[-] Hellgruen@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

That doesn’t change the fact that battery storage is a business case with exponential growth and is just taking off while nuclear power is expensive, takes long time to plan and build and all the new fancy stuff is still hypothetical and it’s not certain it will ever take off in regard of recent bankruptcy’s in the smr field

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

True, and if we can make cheap batteries (e.g. sodium based) at scale then it absolutely could become a thing over the next decades. I just don't want energy transition to hinge on unproven tech. We can't play around with this, climate change is way too serious.

[-] Hellgruen@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Like Fukushima, three miles island or Tschernobyl?

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 0 points 12 hours ago

Yes, like those. Your three examples show how benign nuclear power is, factoting in the absolute worst of circumstances and most ridiculous levels of incompetence.

[-] jagermo@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago
[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 11 hours ago

Maybe you should do your own homework before linking Wikipedia at me. Nuclear is safer than hydro in terms of human casualties per energy produced as well as per land mass destroyed, and if you want to make a counter-argument or add any other variable the burden of proof is on you.

[-] jagermo@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago
[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 3 points 10 hours ago
Energy source Deaths/TWh
Brown coal 32.72
Coal 24.62
Oil 18.43
Biomass 4.63
Gas 2.82
Hydropower 1.30
Wind 0.04
Nuclear 0.03
Solar 0.02
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
104 points (81.0% liked)

memes

22340 readers
2824 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS