101
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago

A blue Texas Senate seat is a Democrat wet dream. If the blue wave is actually that big, Trump might actually be fucked.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

If the Dems get power...they actually have to prosecute him. Which.... hopefully happens but I'm not holding my breath for it.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Enough power to remove a sitting president is almost certainly enough power to override any veto he makes.

It would also require close to (or more than) every single Senate seat going blue this year. Because going from 46/54 to 67/33 is a huge 23 seat swing.

(I'd look up the partisan split of this years senate races but I don't want to make myself depressed.)

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I wouldn’t even prioritize this anymore: he’s too old to serve out the sentence he deserves. But he also seems to be trying to set up a line of royalty. His sons are becoming billionaires from his efforts at exploiting the people and those seeking influence. They’ll be around for decades longer and have wealth and influence based entirely on corruption.

This needs to be the priority. All those who helped defraud the country or profited illegitimately. Prosecute them. Prosecute them all. Remove the political power gained from corruption. Set an example for future minions and coat tails hangers on, that there is no profit in it and they will face justice

[-] Abyssian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

lol. Prosecute him? Who would enforce it? He has his new personal army and leads the Us military. The Judicial and Legislative have nothing to handle that. If he loses the house and senate I fully expect him to just start completely ignoring both of them.

Or to send ICE to arrest all the Democrats in the Senate and House who were foreign born or had parents who were, announce they're all no longer citizens because of his insane illegal executive order, and deport them.

The US military would likely still refuse that. But ICE? That's who he'd send. And if anyone tried to defend the politicians he was targeting and it turned in to a fire fight against ICE that's when he's pop the insurrection act. Ordering the military to kidnap sitting US politicians is one thing, but ordering them up to defend the federal agents in ICE from the "evil insurrectionist terrorist dumocrat libtards" shooting at them? I'm really worried they would do that.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Prosecution would require a compliant president.

[-] chahn.chris@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago

I want to see trials not just of Trump, but of all the criminals around him. All of them, we need to restore law to this rotting apple.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yes, this, so much this. His family needs to pay, as well. Same with his son in law.

And those pardoned terrorists need to be sent back to prison to serve out their terms. And that bitch Tina Peters. Anyone given a pardon from him (or people caving to him, like that jerkoff Jared Polis) need to have that pardon just flatly ignored. Just send something like ICE after them by the new president and let them try to fight it out in courts.

Let's show these motherfuckers some actual "lawfare" for them to cry about, LOL.

[-] chahn.chris@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

They can have due process, that’s part of restoring the law, but the evidence is legion and they should easily be sent to jail.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, of course. But it's time for them to enjoy some of the "you can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride". It is time for some actual "lawfare" to be directed at conservative criminals for once.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, this, so much this. His family needs to pay, as well. Same with his son in law.

And those pardoned terrorists need to be sent back to prison to serve out their terms. And that bitch Tina Peters. Anyone given a pardon from him (or people caving to him, like that jerkoff Jared Polis) need to have that pardon just flatly ignored. Just send something like ICE after them by the new president and let them try to fight it out in courts.

Let's show these motherfuckers some actual "lawfare" for them to cry about, LOL.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

That won't happen without the presidency, but starting to compile the evidence is a possibility.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
101 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30708 readers
3452 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS