179
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] addie@feddit.uk 1 points 10 hours ago

Flatpaks bring all their own libraries with them rather than using the system ones.

  • (plus) you avoid dependency hell, apps "just work"
  • (minus) centralised version updates are less effective for bug and security fixes; all flatpaks must be updated separately
  • (minus) all flatpak apps take additional disk space since they bring everything with them
  • (minus) all flatpak apps take additional memory; Linux can't keep a single copy of a library read-only in memory if multiple apps are using it

I think they have their place for apps that are under very heavy development, or for apps which are extremely "resource heavy" in comparison to the system resources that they use (by which I mean, games). I wouldn't want my bread-and-butter system utilities to be flatpaks.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
179 points (100.0% liked)

PC Master Race

22016 readers
586 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS