344
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@lemmy.world

Active users of President Donald Trump’s social media platform have dropped like flies.

Trump’s Truth Social site, where he threatens other countries and posts self-aggrandizing AI slop, has experienced a dramatic drop in daily active users of its mobile app since last July, according to the Financial Times.

The outlet, citing estimates from the digital market intelligence company SimilarWeb, reported that the mobile site’s daily active users have plummeted from 436,000 in July 2025 to only 261,000 one year later.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] altphoto@lemmy.today 9 points 6 days ago

What I don't understand is why people are still on Facebook and X. They should start a community on the Fediverse.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago

Facebook hides its true colors well enough that they layman has no idea why they should avoid it. X on the other hand openly has a CSAM generator running as a feature, and people are fine with it.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 6 points 6 days ago

You mean, the people who know why social networks such as Facebook and X are bad, who despise their owners, know of the existence of the fediverse, how to use it and want to be fediverse evangelists in their social circle? Dozens of them.

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

The retired navy guy who owns a bar in ohio and his friend group knows nothing about the fediverse, are not exposed to people who would.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Fuck, it seems many people in tech don't know about it, either. At least from my anecdotal experience.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Network effect is hard to overcome. Just try getting a few people to sign up with the Fediverse, nevermind an entire group. I remember trying to tell co-workers - in tech, mind you - about Diaspora and how they should sign up and check it.

I was met with dumb stares or questions about how it's going to work if there is no money in it, or asking about "who is on it" (meaning, celebrities and so on) etc.

And that is from people in tech. JFC. Nevermind trying to explain it to people who have zero interest in tech...

I felt like I was talking to normies in the pre (public) Internet days and trying to explain USENET to them, or explaining BBSes...

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Old habits die hard.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
344 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30763 readers
2176 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS