▲ 408 ▼ Winona police want to know who stole their Flock surveillance cameras (www.mprnews.org) submitted 3 weeks ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world 127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Good idea. Dont forget to put your phone in it and give it a call, to see if it’s really blocking signals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It generally does. But even if some signal escapes (like if you had to hurry and do this so it wasn’t perfectly sealed), it wouldn’t be that great a signal so communication would definitely be compromised. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago Good call. Another unreasonably expensive approach would be to paint it into a faraday cage. Maybe it can work to block visuals and comms, and don’t even have to remove the device. https://a.co/d/0aU2jhw3 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It generally does. But even if some signal escapes (like if you had to hurry and do this so it wasn’t perfectly sealed), it wouldn’t be that great a signal so communication would definitely be compromised. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago Good call. Another unreasonably expensive approach would be to paint it into a faraday cage. Maybe it can work to block visuals and comms, and don’t even have to remove the device. https://a.co/d/0aU2jhw3 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago Good call. Another unreasonably expensive approach would be to paint it into a faraday cage. Maybe it can work to block visuals and comms, and don’t even have to remove the device. https://a.co/d/0aU2jhw3 permalink fedilink source parent