41

Washington (United States) (AFP) – US President Donald Trump said Monday that negotiations with Iran were ongoing despite Tehran's denials and the Islamic Republic was facing a "last chance before decapitation."

Trump, speaking to reporters at the White House, said he agreed to continue to pursue talks with Iran at the request of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and other countries.

Iran's foreign ministry denied on Monday that negotiations with Washington were taking place, but Trump insisted they were. "We are talking right now," he said.

"This is a last chance for them to sign a good document," the US president added. "I want to give them every last chance before decapitation."

The talks are focused on reopening the Strait of Hormuz, which Trump said could come "literally by tomorrow," and the denuclearization of Iran, which he said could "take a little while."

Washington and Tehran have been at war since February 28, when the United States and Israel launched surprise strikes against Iran, though months of on-and-off diplomacy have led to periods of relative calm.

More than five months later, Iran remains able to fire missiles and drones at US and allied targets in the region and retains its enriched uranium stockpiles.

In what has become a familiar pattern, Trump last week had threatened to hit Iran "very hard" -- potentially with renewed attacks against energy infrastructure -- only to pull back on Saturday, saying the "perimeters" of a deal were there.

Iran, for its part, said it is not currently negotiating with the United States.

"Our negotiations are with Oman to secure passage through the Strait of Hormuz," the critical oil corridor, foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You supported a genocidal war-crime admiring candidate

And now Donald Trump is president.

How's that going?

Like, in general, but also specifically for Palestinians?

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

I think the real question should be how was it under Biden? Trump is terrible and things still aren't great for Palestinians, but a majority of the death figures we have so far were while Biden was in office. That could change but as of right now are you saying somehow Palestinians were better off with the second-in-command of the administration that supported, funded, and assisted in massacring a majority of them?

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

I think the real question should be how was it under Biden?

Easy question. Not nearly as bad. Why? Because Biden repeatedly and openly expressed his disapproval with Israel's actions. Biden was trying to broker a peace deal. He even floated arms shipment cancellations if Israel didn't come to the table. Then America told him to go fuck himself and installed a guy that is 100% on Israel's side, Netanyahu's little bitch, and even joked about making a resort on Palestinian land after they're all murdered/chased off.

Guess you were in a coma for all that though.

but a majority of the death figures we have so far were while Biden was in office

Guess that's when Israel got most of their killing out of the way. Probably because it was at the beginning of the conflict when everything was popping off.

administration that supported, funded, and assisted in massacring

Yeah that's still happening.

It's disengenous to the extreme to imply that Palestinians are better off now under a war crime loving, low IQ Republican administration than under the Democrats. Not that the USA is the end-all-be-all of Palestine's future as it isn't our fucking country.

Anyone who voted Republican or helped them by voting for a 3rd party candidate that literally could not win only succeeded in making Palestine's situation more terminal.

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Do you honestly hear yourself? Joe, proud Zionist, Biden who was working on being able to wag his finger publicly at Netanyahu by vetoing UN security council resolutions to stop the genocide?

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/49-times-us-has-used-veto-power-against-un-resolutions-israel

Biden was as much Netanyahu's bitch as Trump, if not more. As for openly expressing his disapproval of Netanyahu, you must be talking about the media reports of alleged disapproval; the same media claiming he was so quick witted behind the curtains of Oz—we all saw the emperor had no clothes—rather than doing more than writing a Chuck Schumer strongly worded letter.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Do you honestly hear yourself?

Yeah. I'm no genius, but you're making me look like one. And I'm just stating facts and making common sense arguments.

The problem here is that you don't seem to see any shades of grey. You think because I accept the reality that Palestine's future, while bleak, was better while Democrats were at the helm than Republicans that means I think Dems are perfect and Biden is a saint. Not what I said. But you're seeing things in black and white only, like everyone who fucked up and didn't vote or voted 3rd party for president because they were big mad about what was going on in a country on the other side of the planet while not focusing on their own nation's wellbeing.

Biden was as much Netanyahu’s bitch as Trump, if not more.

This is such a stupid statement I'm not entirely sure how to address it. I mean the Republican House just passed the U.S.-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative, which in some ways merges the U.S. military with the Isreali military. Did Biden and the Dems do that? Trump has done nothing but give a smile and two massive thumbs up to Netanyahu. So Biden openly expressing discontent witn Netanyahu and floating arms shipment cancellations is proof that Biden wasn't "as much Netanyahu's bitch as Trump".

You're arguing in bad faith. Probably because you don't inform yourself and aren't aware half the shit I've said even took place. I think you're probably an independent comfortably riding the fence, but you sound like a MAGAt.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
41 points (90.2% liked)

Global News

6802 readers
316 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS