875
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Not really, that's just how it's been portrayed over time. The American revolution wasn't led by American workers, it was agitated by the founding American aristocracy who were angry that there was a higher power than them controlling how they made their money. Many of the founding fathers made their fortunes from smuggling operations.

It's not like they abolished taxation or gave broad representation to average Americans. The American revolution was a revolution for the rich by the rich. It's the reason why we have a bicameral Congress, where senators act as overseer over the decisions of the common people. It wasn't until the 17th amendment passed in 1913 that senators actually started to be elected by the people.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 3 days ago

Yup, and IIRC the colonies did benefit from the taxation. King George built infrastructure and provided soldiers and shit.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
875 points (99.3% liked)

Work Reform

17094 readers
1635 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS