view the rest of the comments
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world
7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
How often do you read books for fun?
I read quite a bit. Blogs and books. It's more the speaking part. And conversations often tend to go to politics which doesn't really interest me. So I find it hard to have good opinions on those kind of matters. And what do you know: those tend to be the charged and opinionated conversations that slowly turn into serious debates lol.
Awesome, just wanted to rule out that potential experience vector.
Honestly, the best way to learn is to ask the person who misunderstood you what it was that made them draw that conclusion. It might not always work, but people like me are more than happy to explain their thought process. It's good to emphasize that you're not being argumentative, but that you want to understand where the miscommunication is. But that only works on people who are having a real discussion.
But one thing you have to remember is that many people don't argue in good faith. A strawman argument is when someone intentionally misrepresents your argument to more easily refute it. The only real action against that is to clearly contradict their misrepresentation.
If they continue the strawman or move the goalposts after that, you're wasting your energy and are better off disengaging. Maybe reading a book on logical fallacies would be beneficial so you can more easily identify them.
Being a devil's advocate is a great way to practice, because being able to make a good argument in favor of something you disagree with helps a lot with knowing how to refute it.
But practice makes perfect, so feel free to tag me and start arguments with me when you see me pop up. I have you tagged as "debate practice" so I respond appropriately.
That's really kind of you. Alas my communications problems are really more face to face IRL. You are really kind for offering that tho, all the grace to you <3
You're welcome! I wish there was more genuine debate on this platform, but it seems to quickly devolve into personal attacks each time.
I made an edit that might have been after your comment about playing devil's advocate.
One way around the "in person" issue might be to use text to speech with a local LLM (or a lemmy user), although you'd need to heavily prompt the LLM to disagree with you and understand that it'll be more agreeable than a person. Or argue in front of a mirror and work on playing both roles. Say what comes to your mind, then analyze your statement for holes.