WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has dropped its case against a former Olympic canoeist charged in connection with damage to the Reflecting Pool, acknowledging their allegations against David “Davey” Hearn don’t hold water.

In a filing Friday afternoon, a supervisor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, which is headed by Jeanine Pirro, wrote that officials obtained information that undermined “the evidentiary basis for the indictment” against Hearn.

Prosecutors said that after the indictment, the Interior Department “provided additional documents to the USAO-DC indicating that damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in June 2026 was the result of flawed installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings.”

DOJ said they “first became aware of information showing that the damage was the result of a botched installation and not vandalism” after reviewing more documents.

The Justice Department filing said that based on its review of evidence, “it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage to the Reflecting Pool to vandalism, let alone to establish that fact beyond a reasonable doubt.”

A spokesperson for Pirro said the filing spoke for itself. Her office also moved to dismiss at least one of the other three misdemeanor cases that had been brought in connection with the Reflecting Pool.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 99 points 2 months ago (15 children)

I was under the impression there was ample visual evidence that the pool installation was clearly botched prior to the arrest of this Olympic athlete.

Therefore, I'm inclined to believe there's something disingenuous about this response from the DOJ:

DOJ said they “first became aware of information showing that the damage was the result of a botched installation and not vandalism” after reviewing more documents.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

If the above assumption is true, I wonder if the Olympic athlete can file a legal complaint against the DOJ.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    I was willing to believe the installation was botched until the Trump Administration said so. Now I'm convinced the installation was just overpriced, and the damage was done by Trump driving his motorcade down the middle before it was fully cured.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Driving an armored motorcade through it sure didn’t help, and the installation of lining doesn’t even address leakage or any issues with the pool anyway, just handing money to friends.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    They used a fucking spray on truck bed liner…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    It's a similar, but different different coating from the bedliner stuff, meant for chemical storage tanks. The problem is that it can't be done in sections because it doesn't adhere to itself once it skins over.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    And then when blame time comes, throwing those friends under the motorcade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Nah he rehired the same guy to redo it and for other projects around the district unfortunately.

    And arresting someone several days after pieces were filmed floating in the water, and only dropping it when the masses wouldn’t blindly follow? That’s icing on the ‘we know what caused it’ cake.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago

    The DOJ lawyers could be liable personally for sanctions if it turns out they already "knew" this information at the time they were presenting the case to the grand jury. Therefore the official story has to be that they didn't "know."

    Sanctions could include things like monetary fines, referral to bar association discipline, and so forth. In the Chicago 6 case, the defendants were awarded their attorneys' fees as a sanction after grand jury misconduct.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    What happened is that they needed to admit the job was botched in order to make an insurance claim. The company which manufacrures the coating also seemed to be getting ready to start lobbing legal grenades

  • source
  • parent