38
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] opiumfree@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

people from global north countries that have never known as little as the hardship of traveling with a weak passport when the former colony that had widespread poverty less than 40 years ago, does not cut off from all trade and participation in the global economy so that everybody can fucking Die in squalor and water wars just so they can feel like they do socialism right

[-] RedPartisan@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's worth remembering that a significant amount of accusations of revisionism towards China come from Maoist insurgents and other anti-revisionist parties. I'm not saying they are right (I didn't read enough to confidently say they are or aren't), but we should acknowledge that it's not just Western ultras.

[-] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago

"Anti-revisionists", looks inside: revisionists

[-] RedPartisan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Literal people's warriors are revisionist?

[-] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Fighting a protracted people's war is certainly admirable, is it the correct strategy in all circumstances? No. Is it the right strategy in the Phillipines? It has a severe lack of results to speak for itself, instead the maoists say China's revisionism is why they're failing. Even if that's the case, why would they still then continue with a PPW that is achieving very little instead of analysing concrete conditions and applying a different strategy that might be more fruitful?

[-] dazaroo@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

each revolution has its own conditions; mao and the cpc themselves realised this when they tried to apply the russian strategy to china. Assuming 21st century Philippines would work like mid 20th century China seems to me like a repetition of the same error and makes me question how they can call themselves Maoist

[-] RedPartisan@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I get what you are saying, but you are critiqueing dogmatism. That is a seperate problem. Dogmatism is being closed minded towards newer theory / tactics and strategic retreats. Revisionism is the abandonment of class struggle and integrating into bourgeois politics.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
38 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

5249 readers
84 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS