629
submitted 2 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pleiades@lemmy.ml 6 points 21 hours ago

Wikipedia is biased by nature as a secondary source, just towards the political paradigm so you don't recognize it as easily. In fact, here's a Wikipedia page you might want to check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Hey does ProleWiki have a page talking about its own issues? Weird how "evil" and "biased" wikipedia will explictly tell you about possible issues and its own history without issue, but ProleWiki won't.

But sure, wikipedia is the dishonest one. Lemme go see how objective ProleWiki is on topics it dislikes.

[-] pleiades@lemmy.ml -1 points 19 hours ago

I wouldn't know, I've barely used it.

Just checked and it doesn't seem to, but considering it's a much smaller and newer project than Wikipedia that would make sense.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Fair enough. Thank you for responding.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
629 points (91.9% liked)

Socialism

6903 readers
514 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS