587
submitted 1 day ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] boaratio@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago

If you think Wikipedia is biased, then I have nothing further to say to you. Enjoy OAN, News Max, Fox News, and all that other right wing horse shit. Wikipedia is community consensus. It's the only place I get my "news" from.

[-] pleiades@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

Wikipedia is biased by nature as a secondary source, just towards the political paradigm so you don't recognize it as easily. In fact, here's a Wikipedia page you might want to check out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 hours ago

Hey does ProleWiki have a page talking about its own issues?

[-] pleiades@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 hours ago

I wouldn't know, I've barely used it.

Just checked and it doesn't seem to, but considering it's a much smaller and newer project than Wikipedia that would make sense.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

Fair enough. Thank you for responding.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 hours ago

yes, wikipedia is community consensus and community consensus once was that iraq had wmd's -- the foia proved otherwise. consensus isn't truth; it's just the most popular opinion at the time.

the foia gives you what the us government tries to hide. it is literally the us government itself being legally forced to share its secrets to the american public because of a law that was passed decades before the us gov't became fully captured by corporate interests and the epstein class.

[-] G4Z@lemmy.world 0 points 45 minutes ago

community consensus once was that iraq had wmd’s

It really wasn't.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
587 points (93.1% liked)

Socialism

6893 readers
636 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS