61
He’s a doctor and a progressive. Will he win a key US Senate race in Michigan?
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
61 points (100.0% liked)
politics
30575 readers
2641 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
"Doctor" he lied about being a physician. He completed med school, but never did residency or worked as a physician. He continued on to become an epidemiologist.
Now he has a PhD so "Doctor" is technically true. He had to stop calling himself a physician after politico released this article
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't someone who graduated from medical school a doctor? You just can't practice without supervision until you go through residency, right? But like, someone on their first day of residency is still a "doctor," not a "student doctor."
If rather than becoming licensed to practice medicine unsupervised he continued his schooling to become an epidemiologist, it doesn't mean he isn't an MD or DO (whichever he received from medical school), right?
Edit: Ah, the hangup is over the word "physician." That's...okay that seems silly to me but I guess I generally do hear that word in the context of "licensed physician." So I can understand objecting to its use for someone who is not licensed.
To answer the question the weirdo refused to: he's a medical doctor. No need to talk about his academic title, he graduated medical school, has a M.D. and thus is a doctor in common parlance.
They're 100% trying to manufacture a controversy over something that's completely irrelevant and responding in weasely ways to imply there something more going on.
Yes, he is a doctor. He has a PhD.
Earlier in his campaign he lied about being a physician. I have no idea why.
Now this article pops up and the title calls him doctor. Which in this context sounds like physician, but is technically true. And I have no idea why again.
Is this just for Healthcare expertise credentials? As far as I understand he still works adjacent to the field. This is just such a weird thing to lie about.
Putting the best construction on it, I suspect it wasn’t a lie but rather a misguided attempt to distinguish between his PhD and his medical degree. As in, he is a doctor of medicine and a doctor of epidemiology. One might say “physician and doctor” or something.
But people took umbrage with the use of “physician,” which implies actual practice and licensure, so he stopped using it.
Calling it “lying” adds a level of dishonesty that I’m not sure is warranted. But that’s just me, you do you.
From your Politico article:
Good enough for me.
Lol. You really posted this as if it's some major exposé. Centrists are a trip.
Wow, thanks Politico for saving us from another socialist monster!
I can't wait to see what they cook up when they start to get desperate