218

“Corporations are people, my friend,” Mitt Romney famously said in 2011 while running for president. The Supreme Court decided the previous year that corporations could give money to political campaigns, just like people, and in 2014, the high court gave corporations religious freedom to deny contraceptives to employees, thereby letting them behave just as badly as people. If you prick corporations, do they not bleed?

Actually no, they don’t. But as of now, they can get presidential pardons.

The notion that corporations are people did not originate with the Supreme Court’s notorious Citizens United decision in 2010. Way back in 1886, the high court ruled in Santa Clara County v. Union Pacific Railroad that corporations were covered by the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. To be more precise, this question was addressed not in the decision (which resolved a local taxation dispute) but rather in a headnote that said the court “does not wish to hear argument on the question” of whether the Fourteenth Amendment applies to corporations because “we are all of the opinion that it does.“ Somehow this non sequitur became legal precedent. “Later cases,” wrote Stetson University law professor Clara Torres-Spelliscy in a 2014 analysis for the nonprofit Brennan Center for Justice, “uncritically cited the headnote as if it had been part of the case.”


You know what isn’t declining? Pardons for corporations. Trump has granted nine. These were never a thing before Trump—not in the modern era, and possibly never. According to Bloomberg’s Ava Benny-Morrison, the nine pardons wiped out $200 million in financial penalties, “some of which were destined for victims of wrongdoing.” Frank Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri, told Bloomberg: “In any previous era no president would touch this with a barge pole. Maybe individual cases with some compelling reason, but the systemic elimination of criminal liability of major financial crime would never have happened before, and it didn’t.”

Half of the $200 million in wiped-out fines can be attributed to a single crypto company, BitMEX. The three co-founders of the company, a pioneer in crypto derivatives, all pleaded guilty in 2022 to violating the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires maintaining certain safeguards against money laundering. Each paid $10 million in fines. Then, in July 2024, BitMEX itself pleaded guilty to the same crime, and this past January the company was fined $100 million.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

Then we get to the environmental impact of the technology we proliferated. Hundreds of millions of people dead from lead poisoning with estimates as high as 5 million a year to this day mostly due to air pollution from burning gas.

Fair-ish. But, while the US proliferated the assembly line, the IC engine actually came about from a combination of French and German inventors. Though, the US did propegate an oil empire, its a tad unfair to place the blame solely with the US. Admittedly, the US has taken a hard right as to getting off its oil addiction.

Then we get to the environmental impact of the technology we proliferated. Hundreds of millions of people dead from lead poisoning with estimates as high as 5 million a year to this day mostly due to air pollution from burning gas. The entire Earth blanketed in lead so bad it is released in significant quantities when you burn wood now.

The industrial use of lead goes back to the 4th century BC. Can't blame a country that officially formed 250 and unofficially started ~600 years ago for a problem that was around for ~2,000 before its start and had global usage. You'd be better off pointing to Agent Orange. But, that too was invented by a British company, Imperial Chemical Industries.

Not to mention every single human on earth simultaneously poisoned by micro plastics and forever chemicals.

The existence of micro plastics isn't inherently the fault of one country. The biggest plastic-polluters are Africa and Asia. But, plastic was originally invented by the British.

We have more slavery today than at any time in history.

13th Amendment + a nations right of self determination make that inherently not the US's fault ongoing fault. Slavery has been around for thousands of years. Africans did slavery too. Just look at the make up of Mansa Musa's pilgrimage (had ~12,000 slaves). Europe didn't get around to banning slavery until not long before USA did. Slavery was a crime against humanity by all of humanity, not an inherently unique problem to the USA, which got off its slavery addiction pretty quickly in comparison to the rest of the world. That again shows the general tilt towards liberty.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
218 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30534 readers
2687 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS